Interventions for increasing chlamydia screening in primary care: a review

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Despite guidelines recommending opportunistic chlamydia screening of younger women, screening rates in some countries remain low. Our aim was to review the evidence for specific interventions aimed at increasing chlamydia screening r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hocking Jane S (Author), Bowden Francis J (Author), Fairley Christopher K (Author), Ginige Samitha (Author), Chen Marcus Y (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2007-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f8fec76d00af46afaa6fe7aab3fb2a10
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Hocking Jane S  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Bowden Francis J  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fairley Christopher K  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ginige Samitha  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chen Marcus Y  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Interventions for increasing chlamydia screening in primary care: a review 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2007-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/1471-2458-7-95 
500 |a 1471-2458 
520 |a <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Despite guidelines recommending opportunistic chlamydia screening of younger women, screening rates in some countries remain low. Our aim was to review the evidence for specific interventions aimed at increasing chlamydia screening rates in primary care.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A Medline search was conducted for controlled trials that assessed the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving chlamydia screening rates in primary health care settings. The Medline search was done for studies in English published prior to December 2005 using the following key words: chlamydia, screening, intervention, primary care and GPs. In addition, the references cited in the articles were reviewed. Studies in English published prior to December 2005 were reviewed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Four controlled studies met the inclusion criteria - 3 were randomized studies and one was not. Strategies to increase screening rates included the use of educational packages targeting primary care physicians and the correction of barriers to screening within clinic systems. In 3 studies, the intervention was associated with an increase in screening rates of between 100% and 276% (p < 0.04). In the fourth study, the intervention was associated with a significant attenuation in declining screening rates over time (4% versus 34% decline, p = 0.04).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>There are only a limited number of randomized or controlled studies that demonstrate improved chlamydia screening of younger women in primary care.</p> 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Public Health, Vol 7, Iss 1, p 95 (2007) 
787 0 |n http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/7/95 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f8fec76d00af46afaa6fe7aab3fb2a10  |z Connect to this object online.