About the Efficacy of Virtual and Remote Laboratories in STEM Education in Secondary School: A Second-Order Systematic Review

Online laboratories brought new opportunities for instruction. In this work, a secondorder systematic review about the efficacy of virtual and remote labs on learning in high school STEM education is presented. Nine systematic review and a meta-analysis were included. A descriptive summary (qualitat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniela Fadda (Author), Carole Salis (Author), Giuliano Vivanet (Author)
Format: Book
Published: LED Edizioni Universitarie, 2022-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f97dae2f4f214afab08e8f80db5bd914
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Daniela Fadda  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Carole Salis  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Giuliano Vivanet  |e author 
245 0 0 |a About the Efficacy of Virtual and Remote Laboratories in STEM Education in Secondary School: A Second-Order Systematic Review 
260 |b LED Edizioni Universitarie,   |c 2022-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2037-7932 
500 |a 2037-7924 
500 |a 10.7358/ecps-2022-026-fadd 
520 |a Online laboratories brought new opportunities for instruction. In this work, a secondorder systematic review about the efficacy of virtual and remote labs on learning in high school STEM education is presented. Nine systematic review and a meta-analysis were included. A descriptive summary (qualitative and quantitative) of their findings is provided. On average, online laboratories support learning to an extent comparable to that observed in real labs; their effect is even more positive when they are integrated into more traditional teaching practice (e.g., as pre-lab practice sessions before the hands-on experiments) and when they are supported by adequate teacher feedback. Content knowledge is the learning outcome most often assessed; while practical and inquiry skills related to scientific reasoning are investigated less frequently. The results are promising for instructional design and for the future research, despite the data variability and some methodological limitations of individual studies (lack of relevant quantitative data, such as effect sizes and moderator analysis). Further experimental research is required to estimate the effect of online labs on different learning outcomes and to better understand the moderating role of some variables related to interventions and students. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
546 |a IT 
690 |a online laboratory 
690 |a remote laboratory 
690 |a secondary school 
690 |a stem education 
690 |a virtual laboratory. 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, Vol 0, Iss 26, Pp 51-72 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://www.ledonline.it/index.php/ECPS-Journal/article/view/3166 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2037-7932 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2037-7924 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f97dae2f4f214afab08e8f80db5bd914  |z Connect to this object online.