Inequality in health versus inequality in lifestyle choices

Repeated Norwegian cross-sectional data for the period 2005 to 2011 are used to compare sources of inequality in health, as represented by self-assessed health and obesity, with sources of inequality in lifestyles that are central to the production of health, as represented by physical activity, cig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arnstein Øvrum (Author), Kyrre Rickertsen (Author)
Format: Book
Published: University of Oslo, 2015-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f9890b6ccf8442c8a1b9d35fd5dbe86c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Arnstein Øvrum  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kyrre Rickertsen  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Inequality in health versus inequality in lifestyle choices 
260 |b University of Oslo,   |c 2015-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.5617/njhe.972 
500 |a 1892-9729 
500 |a 1892-9710 
520 |a Repeated Norwegian cross-sectional data for the period 2005 to 2011 are used to compare sources of inequality in health, as represented by self-assessed health and obesity, with sources of inequality in lifestyles that are central to the production of health, as represented by physical activity, cigarette smoking and dietary behavior. Sources of overall inequality and socioeconomic inequality in these lifestyle and health indicators are compared by estimating probit models, and by decomposing the explained part of the associated Gini and concentration indices with respect to education and income. As potential sources of inequality, we consider education, income, occupation, age, gender, marital status, psychological traits and childhood circumstances. Our results suggest that sources of inequality in health are not necessarily representative of sources of inequality in underlying lifestyles. While education is generally an important source of overall inequality in both lifestyles and health, income is unimportant in all lifestyle indicators except physical activity. In several cases, education and income are clearly outranked by other factors in terms of explaining overall inequality, such as gender in eating fruits and vegetables and age in fish consumption. These results suggest that it is important to decompose both overall inequality and socioeconomic inequality in different lifestyle and health indicators. In indicators where other factors than education and income are clearly most important, policy makers should consider to target these factors to efficiently improve overall population health. Published: Online October 2015. In print December 2015. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Concentration index 
690 |a Gini index 
690 |a Health inequality 
690 |a Inequality in lifestyle choices 
690 |a Socioeconomic status 
690 |a Norway 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
690 |a Economic theory. Demography 
690 |a HB1-3840 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Nordic Journal of Health Economics, Vol 3, Iss 1 (2015) 
787 0 |n https://journals.uio.no/NJHE/article/view/972 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1892-9729 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1892-9710 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f9890b6ccf8442c8a1b9d35fd5dbe86c  |z Connect to this object online.