Bond strength of relined print and conventional denture base resins after aging
Objectives: To compare the bond strength of printed and conventionally produced denture base resins to reline resins after being submitted to a physical-chemical aging process. Methods: Sixty specimens (10×10×3.3 mm) of two printed (V-Print Dentbase and Denture 3D+) and one conventionally produced (...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentária,
2023-09-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_fa5f9bf8fe1f47a38f7b64bbb27daef3 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Sofia Brito Morais |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Ana Bettencourt |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Jaime Portugal |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Cristina Bettencourt Neves |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Bond strength of relined print and conventional denture base resins after aging |
260 | |b Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentária, |c 2023-09-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 10.24873/j.rpemd.2023.08.1063 | ||
500 | |a 1646-2890 | ||
500 | |a 1647-6700 | ||
520 | |a Objectives: To compare the bond strength of printed and conventionally produced denture base resins to reline resins after being submitted to a physical-chemical aging process. Methods: Sixty specimens (10×10×3.3 mm) of two printed (V-Print Dentbase and Denture 3D+) and one conventionally produced (Probase Hot) denture base resins were relined with two acrylic resins: Ufi Gel Hard C and Probase Cold (n=10). The specimens were submitted to 1000 cycles of thermal fluctuations (5-55ºC) and 28 days of pH cycles using pH=3 (8 h/day) and pH=7 (16 h/day). Then, the shear bond strength was evaluated (1 KN; 1 mm/min), and the failure mode was classified as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed type. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and t-tests (?=0.05). Results: Bond strength values ranged from 8.9 to 21.5 MPa. No statistically significant (p=0.07) differences were found between the bond strength of the three denture base acrylic resins. The reline resin did not significantly (p=0.07) affect the bond strength of the two printed resins. However, relining the Probase Hot with Probase Cold yielded a higher bond strength (p<0.001) than with Ufi Gel Hard C. Only the Probase Hot-Ufi Gel Hard C group revealed 100% of failures classified as adhesive type. Conclusions: The two printed denture base resins obtained similar bond strength to conventionally produced denture base resin after being submitted to thermal and chemical aging. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
546 | |a PT | ||
690 | |a adhesion | ||
690 | |a cad-cam polymers | ||
690 | |a chemical aging | ||
690 | |a thermal aging | ||
690 | |a Dentistry | ||
690 | |a RK1-715 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial, Vol 64, Iss 3, Pp 105-111 (2023) | |
787 | 0 | |n https://administracao.spemd.pt/app/assets/imagens/files_img/1_19_651be0b042788.pdf | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1646-2890 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1647-6700 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/fa5f9bf8fe1f47a38f7b64bbb27daef3 |z Connect to this object online. |