Adaptive Changes in the Posterior Pharyngeal Wall Following Large Retraction of Incisors During Comprehensive Orthodontic Treatment

Objective:To evaluate the effects of large retraction of incisors on the adaptive changes in the posterior pharyngeal wall and soft palate during comprehensive orthodontic treatment.Methods:Twenty-seven females with Class I mild crowding or spacing who required non-extraction treatment (group I) and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ashok Kumar Jena (Author), Venkatachalapathy Anusuya (Author), Jitendra Sharan (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Galenos Yayinevi, 2022-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_fab6b9d9ed1e4c7e8959ac5e09121bed
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ashok Kumar Jena  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Venkatachalapathy Anusuya  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jitendra Sharan  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Adaptive Changes in the Posterior Pharyngeal Wall Following Large Retraction of Incisors During Comprehensive Orthodontic Treatment 
260 |b Galenos Yayinevi,   |c 2022-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2528-9659 
500 |a 2148-9505 
500 |a 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21157 
520 |a Objective:To evaluate the effects of large retraction of incisors on the adaptive changes in the posterior pharyngeal wall and soft palate during comprehensive orthodontic treatment.Methods:Twenty-seven females with Class I mild crowding or spacing who required non-extraction treatment (group I) and 34 females with Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion who required all first premolars extraction for the retraction of their incisors (group II) were included in the study. The effects of non-extraction and incisor retraction following all first premolars extraction orthodontic treatment on the sagittal dimensions of pharyngeal airway passage and posterior pharyngeal wall thickness were evaluated from pre- and post-treatment cephalograms.Results:The dimensions of pharyngeal airway passage were comparable among the groups. The length of the soft palate increased (P < .01) and the thickness of the soft palate decreased (P < .01) following retraction of incisors, and the difference between the groups was significant (P < .05). The posterior pharyngeal wall thickness was reduced significantly at PPWT2 (P < .05), PPWT3 (P < .001), PPWT4 (P < .001), PPWT5 (P < .001), and PPWT6 (P < .01) regions following retraction of the incisors, and the difference between the groups was statistically highly significant.Conclusions:The large retraction of incisors during comprehensive orthodontic treatment in Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion malocclusion subjects did not affect the sagittal dimensions of pharyngeal airway passage, but the thickness of the posterior pharyngeal wall reduced significantly as an adaptation to maintain the patency of the upper airway. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a bimaxillary protrusion 
690 |a incisor retraction 
690 |a pharyngeal airway passage 
690 |a upper airway 
690 |a pharyngeal wall thickness 
690 |a sleep-disordered breathing 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 35, Iss 4, Pp 248-254 (2022) 
787 0 |n  http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/adaptive-changes-in-the-posterior-pharyngeal-wall-/57849  
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2528-9659 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2148-9505 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/fab6b9d9ed1e4c7e8959ac5e09121bed  |z Connect to this object online.