Aprehender el desarrollo de las organizaciones en la encrucijada entre el curso de acción y el enfoque instrumental: la perspectiva transicional

In this paper, we address the question of possible conceptual ways of thinking about organizations in the making. We begin by introducing the concept of border, which seems heuristic to us, to define organizational development as crossing borders. We then propose to consider the border crossing from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Bationo-Tillon (Author), Céline Poret (Author), Viviane Folcher (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universidade do Porto, 2020-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_fb714b95489748b29e6d26d5fbd0080c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Anne Bationo-Tillon  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Céline Poret  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Viviane Folcher  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Aprehender el desarrollo de las organizaciones en la encrucijada entre el curso de acción y el enfoque instrumental: la perspectiva transicional 
260 |b Universidade do Porto,   |c 2020-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a https://doi.org/10.4000/laboreal.16862 
500 |a 1646-5237 
520 |a In this paper, we address the question of possible conceptual ways of thinking about organizations in the making. We begin by introducing the concept of border, which seems heuristic to us, to define organizational development as crossing borders. We then propose to consider the border crossing from an intrinsic point of view by adopting a transitional perspective. To address these transitional phenomena, we articulate two conceptual ergonomics frameworks: the course of action and the instrumental approach. Through two contrasting researches from the point of view of the fields of activity (travel narratives and a process of treating a customer demand in the energy field), we confront the ways to hybridize these two theoretical frameworks conceptually, methodologically and empirically. We highlight what results from this hybridization: the so-called transitional instruments that confer continuity to different scales. Finally, we discuss the perspectives opened by a transitional approach to think about organizational genesis. 
546 |a ES 
546 |a PT 
690 |a transitional approach 
690 |a development 
690 |a organizational genesis 
690 |a boundaries 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
690 |a Labor. Work. Working class 
690 |a HD4801-8943 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Laboreal, Vol 16, Iss 2 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://journals.openedition.org/laboreal/16862 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1646-5237 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/fb714b95489748b29e6d26d5fbd0080c  |z Connect to this object online.