CITATION INDEX AND OBJECTIVITY OF EXPERTS. ABOUT THE POSSIBLE PHILOSOPHICAL DELIBERATIONS ON THE HOT TOPIC

The article deals with the actual problem associated with using citation index as an instrument for evaluation of research effectiveness. The author calls in question the propriety of applying SCI: firstly, in ability of the CI to be used in order to improve the effectiveness of science, secondly, i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lada V. Shipovalova (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Moscow Polytechnic University, 2016-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_fbc945f6a54b40fda75ef5d51acad0a9
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Lada V. Shipovalova  |e author 
245 0 0 |a CITATION INDEX AND OBJECTIVITY OF EXPERTS. ABOUT THE POSSIBLE PHILOSOPHICAL DELIBERATIONS ON THE HOT TOPIC 
260 |b Moscow Polytechnic University,   |c 2016-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0869-3617 
500 |a 2072-0459 
520 |a The article deals with the actual problem associated with using citation index as an instrument for evaluation of research effectiveness. The author calls in question the propriety of applying SCI: firstly, in ability of the CI to be used in order to improve the effectiveness of science, secondly, in objectivity of CI, thirdly, in the equal opportunity to apply CI to various fields of science. The author argues that SCI use as the means of assessing the effectiveness of science is possible only if the scientific community itself recognizes the CI as a significant element of research, the element of "selfPconsciousness of science". The article also covers the alternative and no less important than the CI objective grounds for recognizing the value of research, including scientific expertise and discussion. The conclusion is that the insistence on the account of these alternatives promotes recognition of the autonomy of scientific activity, accounting for the value of novelty and originality of scientific ideas and, ultimately, the development of science. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a RU 
690 |a индекс цитирования 
690 |a е. гарфилд 
690 |a объективность экспертизы 
690 |a виды объективности 
690 |a научная коммуникация 
690 |a science citation index (sci) 
690 |a e. garfield 
690 |a objectivity of expertise 
690 |a recognition of the value of research 
690 |a scientific communication 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Высшее образование в России, Vol 0, Iss 2, Pp 119-125 (2016) 
787 0 |n https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/582 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0869-3617 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2072-0459 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/fbc945f6a54b40fda75ef5d51acad0a9  |z Connect to this object online.