Mechanical and histological evaluation of a titanium device for orthodontic anchorage, placed with or without cyanoacrylate adhesive

ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of the present study was to perform a histological evaluation of a titanium mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. Shear strength and fracture patterns that occurred immediately, 30 and 60 days after insertion with or without N-2-butyl-cyanoacrylate adhesive were e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anderson Antonio Mamede (Author), Elizabeth Ferreira Martinez (Author), Roberta Tarkany Basting (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Dental Press Editora.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_fbdbb3614ff440a9bcf76675b5efbb5a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Anderson Antonio Mamede  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Elizabeth Ferreira Martinez  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Roberta Tarkany Basting  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Mechanical and histological evaluation of a titanium device for orthodontic anchorage, placed with or without cyanoacrylate adhesive 
260 |b Dental Press Editora. 
500 |a 2177-6709 
500 |a 10.1590/2177-6709.24.3.071-078.oar 
520 |a ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of the present study was to perform a histological evaluation of a titanium mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. Shear strength and fracture patterns that occurred immediately, 30 and 60 days after insertion with or without N-2-butyl-cyanoacrylate adhesive were evaluated. Methods: Ninety-six mini-implants (Arrow, Peclab, Brazil) were placed in the tibia of 9 male rabbits, with or without an adhesive (Vetbond™, 3M, USA). Histological evaluation was done by optical light microscope. Shear strength testing was performed, followed by fracture analysis with visual inspection. Results: Close contact between the newly formed bone and the device was evidenced in the group without adhesive, whereas gaps in the group with adhesive were found. Tukey test showed similar values in both groups at the immediate time point (20.70 N without adhesive and 24.69 N with adhesive), and higher values for the non-adhesive group, after 30 and 60 days (43.98 N and 78.55 N, respectively). The values for the adhesive group were similar for the immediate time point (24.69 N), 30 days (18.23 N) and 60 days (31.98 N). The fractures were adhesive for both groups at the immediate time point. The fractures were cohesive in bone for the non-adhesive group after 30 and 60 days. Conclusions: The mini-implants showed close bone contact and required higher shear strength for removal at 30 and 60 days for the non-adhesive group. Further studies are needed to assess the proper way to remove the orthodontic anchorage without cohesive fractures in bone. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Cortical bone 
690 |a Orthodontic anchorage procedures 
690 |a Fractures 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 24, Iss 3, Pp 71-78 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512019000300071&lng=en&tlng=en 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2177-6709 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/fbdbb3614ff440a9bcf76675b5efbb5a  |z Connect to this object online.