Assessment of electronic patient education materials for adolescent bariatric surgery candidates: An environment scan

Objective: Adolescents who opt for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) will use the internet to learn about the procedure. The objective of this study is to assess the suitability of electronic patient education materials (ePEM) of North American centers that perform adolescent bariatric surgery....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yolanda N. Wang (Author), Alexandra J. Heidl (Author), Patricia M. Angeles (Author), Biagina-Carla Farnesi (Author), Angela S. Alberga (Author), Tamara R. Cohen (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_fc1b044f52bf446cba8c0cdeef98a4cb
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Yolanda N. Wang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alexandra J. Heidl  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Patricia M. Angeles  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Biagina-Carla Farnesi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Angela S. Alberga  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Tamara R. Cohen  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Assessment of electronic patient education materials for adolescent bariatric surgery candidates: An environment scan 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2772-6282 
500 |a 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100143 
520 |a Objective: Adolescents who opt for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) will use the internet to learn about the procedure. The objective of this study is to assess the suitability of electronic patient education materials (ePEM) of North American centers that perform adolescent bariatric surgery. Methods: Canadian and American bariatric centers that perform adolescent MBS were identified from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program and Google web-based searches. Suitability of ePEM for the adolescent readership was evaluated using the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM). Results: Sixty-five centers were evaluated from June to July 2020 with 41% citing adolescent specific material. Six percent of the ePEM were evaluated as 'not suitable', 69% were evaluated as 'adequate', and 25% were evaluated as 'superior'. Conclusion: Adequate ePEM scoring was obtained, but centers had little resources tailored to adolescent patients. Further research is needed to evaluate all the resources provided to adolescents (i.e., resources provided by the health team) to ensure the tools are appropriate for the adolescent readership. Innovation: This environmental scan provided insights to ePEM available for adolescents considering MBS. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Obesity 
690 |a Severe obesity 
690 |a Bariatric surgery 
690 |a Adolescents 
690 |a Patient Education Materials 
690 |a Electronic education materials 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n PEC Innovation, Vol 2, Iss , Pp 100143- (2023) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628223000237 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2772-6282 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/fc1b044f52bf446cba8c0cdeef98a4cb  |z Connect to this object online.