Cyclic fatigue resistance of three reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments with heat treatment at intrachannel temperature
Introduction: the in vitro study compared the dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 reciprocating NiTi files with heat treatment. Methods: we distributed 30 new endodontic files in three groups. The endodontic files selected for this experiment were: AF Blue R3 25/06 (AFB) (Fanta Dental, Shanghai,...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Universidad de Antioquia,
2023-06-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_fc4e55edef304fadb7a80ba801f3b97a | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Maria Alejandra Portillo-Martínez |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Luiz Meton Horta-Dos Santos |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Viviane Rangel-Do Couto |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Marcos Frozoni |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Julieta Mendez |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Cyclic fatigue resistance of three reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments with heat treatment at intrachannel temperature |
260 | |b Universidad de Antioquia, |c 2023-06-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 0121-246X | ||
500 | |a 2145-7670 | ||
500 | |a 10.17533/udea.rfo.v35n1a2 | ||
520 | |a Introduction: the in vitro study compared the dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 reciprocating NiTi files with heat treatment. Methods: we distributed 30 new endodontic files in three groups. The endodontic files selected for this experiment were: AF Blue R3 25/06 (AFB) (Fanta Dental, Shanghai, China), X1 Blue File 25/06 (X1B) (MK Life, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil), and Reciproc Blue 08/25 (RB) (VDW, Munich, Germany. We measured the time to file fractureand the length of the fractured fragment. ANOVA analysis was used, followed by the Tukey test for multiple comparisons, with a significance level of 5% (P < 0.05). Results: the mean time in seconds until the file fractured was 170.7 ±15.1 for AFB files, 110.4 ±26.8 for X1B, and 163.3 ±22.9 for RB files. This difference was statistically significant when comparing X1B to AFB (p: 0.000) and X1B to RB (p: 0.000). However, there are no statistically significant differences between RB and AFB (p:0.739). Conclussions: this study found that RB and AFB files exhibit similar resistance to cyclic fatigue. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a dental instruments | ||
690 | |a shape memory alloys | ||
690 | |a flexural strength | ||
690 | |a Dentistry | ||
690 | |a RK1-715 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia, Vol 35, Iss 1 (2023) | |
787 | 0 | |n https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/odont/article/view/351409 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/0121-246X | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2145-7670 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/fc4e55edef304fadb7a80ba801f3b97a |z Connect to this object online. |