Cyclic fatigue resistance of three reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments with heat treatment at intrachannel temperature

Introduction: the in vitro study compared the dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 reciprocating NiTi files with heat treatment. Methods: we distributed 30 new endodontic files in three groups. The endodontic files selected for this experiment were: AF Blue R3 25/06 (AFB) (Fanta Dental, Shanghai,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Alejandra Portillo-Martínez (Author), Luiz Meton Horta-Dos Santos (Author), Viviane Rangel-Do Couto (Author), Marcos Frozoni (Author), Julieta Mendez (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universidad de Antioquia, 2023-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_fc4e55edef304fadb7a80ba801f3b97a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Maria Alejandra Portillo-Martínez  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Luiz Meton Horta-Dos Santos  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Viviane Rangel-Do Couto  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marcos Frozoni  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Julieta Mendez  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Cyclic fatigue resistance of three reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments with heat treatment at intrachannel temperature 
260 |b Universidad de Antioquia,   |c 2023-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0121-246X 
500 |a 2145-7670 
500 |a 10.17533/udea.rfo.v35n1a2 
520 |a Introduction: the in vitro study compared the dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 reciprocating NiTi files with heat treatment. Methods: we distributed 30 new endodontic files in three groups. The endodontic files selected for this experiment were: AF Blue R3 25/06 (AFB) (Fanta Dental, Shanghai, China), X1 Blue File 25/06 (X1B) (MK Life, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil), and Reciproc Blue 08/25 (RB) (VDW, Munich, Germany. We measured the time to file fractureand the length of the fractured fragment. ANOVA analysis was used, followed by the Tukey test for multiple comparisons, with a significance level of 5% (P < 0.05). Results: the mean time in seconds until the file fractured was 170.7 ±15.1 for AFB files, 110.4 ±26.8 for X1B, and 163.3 ±22.9 for RB files. This difference was statistically significant when comparing X1B to AFB (p: 0.000) and X1B to RB (p: 0.000). However, there are no statistically significant differences between RB and AFB (p:0.739). Conclussions: this study found that RB and AFB files exhibit similar resistance to cyclic fatigue. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a dental instruments 
690 |a shape memory alloys 
690 |a flexural strength 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia, Vol 35, Iss 1 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/odont/article/view/351409 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0121-246X 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2145-7670 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/fc4e55edef304fadb7a80ba801f3b97a  |z Connect to this object online.