The need for new metrics in the Anthropocene era

A limitation in the discussion concerning climate change is the large degree of separation between scientific, economic, and technological approaches to tackle the crisis. This issue is most noticeable when considering the lack of metrics to measure the impact of different productive sectors on both...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paolo Vineis (Author), Lorenzo Mangone (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2022-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_fdc8b3bf6bd24b978ef5568a87e5caa9
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Paolo Vineis  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lorenzo Mangone  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lorenzo Mangone  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The need for new metrics in the Anthropocene era 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2022-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2296-2565 
500 |a 10.3389/fpubh.2022.935743 
520 |a A limitation in the discussion concerning climate change is the large degree of separation between scientific, economic, and technological approaches to tackle the crisis. This issue is most noticeable when considering the lack of metrics to measure the impact of different productive sectors on both the environment and the health of the population. The best-known attempt to measure these repercussions has been the introduction of the Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) ratings for bonds. However, this rating system suffers from a lack of transparency and standardization. Moreover, it does not offer insights on the health impact and the regenerative effort of the evaluated bonds. Thus, we think it is necessary to introduce new metrics, focusing on at least four dimensions: circularity, climate change, biodiversity and health (including well-being). A sector that needs a special consideration is that of energy. To better compare different energy sources, we propose to adjust metrics such as the Energy Return on Investment (EROI) or the energy intensity metrics to include the negative health effects and the environmental degradation associated with producing energy. A similar index of return on investment corrected for health impacts may be considered to evaluate food production as well. Hyper-analytical and extremely focused approaches have dominated the discussion around the environmental crisis. We believe that a more inclusive approach is now needed, to highlight the potential co-benefits of different strategies, especially those that promote regeneration and a truly circular economy. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a climate change 
690 |a regenerative economy 
690 |a sdg 
690 |a EROI 
690 |a co-benefits 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 10 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.935743/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2296-2565 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/fdc8b3bf6bd24b978ef5568a87e5caa9  |z Connect to this object online.