How does Fetal Autopsy after Pregnancy Loss or Termination for Anomalies and other Complications Change Recurrence Risk?

Abstract Objective Historically, fetal autopsy was common after terminations for anomalies. Previous studies report that fetal autopsy confirms ultrasound findings in the majority of cases. This study aims to examine correlation between prenatal and autopsy diagnoses at University of California, San...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arianna Cassidy (Author), Claire Herrick (Author), Mary E. Norton (Author), Philip C. Ursell (Author), Juan Vargas (Author), Jennifer L. Kerns (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_fe4452479f2a48a78e0131eca3f0fbf6
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Arianna Cassidy  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Claire Herrick  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mary E. Norton  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Philip C. Ursell  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Juan Vargas  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jennifer L. Kerns  |e author 
245 0 0 |a How does Fetal Autopsy after Pregnancy Loss or Termination for Anomalies and other Complications Change Recurrence Risk? 
260 |b Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.,   |c 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2157-6998 
500 |a 2157-7005 
500 |a 10.1055/s-0039-1681013 
520 |a Abstract Objective Historically, fetal autopsy was common after terminations for anomalies. Previous studies report that fetal autopsy confirms ultrasound findings in the majority of cases. This study aims to examine correlation between prenatal and autopsy diagnoses at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and evaluate whether autopsy adds diagnostic information, specifically information that changes risk of recurrence for future pregnancies. Study Design We conducted a retrospective chart review of all fetal autopsies performed at UCSF between 1994 and 2009. Prenatal diagnosis was compared with autopsy diagnosis; for cases where there was a change in diagnosis, an MFM (maternal-fetal medicine specialist) reviewed the case to assign risk of recurrence before and after autopsy. Results Overall, there was concordance between prenatal diagnosis and autopsy diagnosis in greater than 91.7% of cases. Autopsy added information that resulted in a change in recurrence risk in 2.3% of cases (n = 9). Conclusion For the vast majority of cases, there is agreement between prenatal and autopsy diagnosis after pregnancy loss or termination for fetal anomalies. Only a small percentage of autopsies change recurrence risk. This may be useful when counseling women about method of termination and when counseling couples about whether to have an autopsy. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a fetal autopsy 
690 |a pregnancy termination 
690 |a anomalies 
690 |a pregnancy complications 
690 |a recurrence risk 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n American Journal of Perinatology Reports, Vol 09, Iss 01, Pp e30-e35 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0039-1681013 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2157-6998 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2157-7005 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/fe4452479f2a48a78e0131eca3f0fbf6  |z Connect to this object online.