Effect of Hydroxyapatite on Surface Roughness of Zirconomer, and Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomers

Objectives: Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are among the most popular dental restorative materials, but their use is limited due to their clinical disadvantages. Many efforts have been made to improve the properties of these materials by adding various fillers. Incorporation of hydroxyapatite (HA) int...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Farahnaz Sharafeddin (Author), Somaye Bahrani (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_fe6fd6f58b0a409e843f96d92c6b0037
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Farahnaz Sharafeddin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Somaye Bahrani  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Effect of Hydroxyapatite on Surface Roughness of Zirconomer, and Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomers 
260 |b Tehran University of Medical Sciences,   |c 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.18502/fid.v17i36.5201 
500 |a 2676-296X 
520 |a Objectives: Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are among the most popular dental restorative materials, but their use is limited due to their clinical disadvantages. Many efforts have been made to improve the properties of these materials by adding various fillers. Incorporation of hydroxyapatite (HA) into the GICs is considered to improve the physical properties of restorations, and may prevent treatment failure. This study aimed to evaluate the surface roughness (Ra) of a conventional glass ionomer cement (CGIC), a resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and a Zirconomer with and without micro-hydroxyapatite (µHA). Materials and Methods: This experimental study was conducted on 6 groups (n=10) including CGIC, CGIC + µHA, RMGI, RMGI + µHA, Zirconomer, and Zirconomer + µHA. A total of 60 disc-shaped samples (6 mm × 2 mm) were prepared in plastic molds and were stored in distilled water for 24 h. After polishing of the specimens, their Ra was measured by a profilometer in micrometers (µm). The data were analyzed using two and one-way ANOVA, Tukey's HSD test, and independent t-test. Results: Incorporation of µHA resulted in statistically significant differences in Ra between the study groups (P<0.05). Following the incorporation of µHA, the Ra significantly decreased in CGIC (P=0.013) and Zirconomer (P=0.003). However, addition of µHA to RMGI resulted in a significant increase in its Ra (P<0.001). Conclusion: Addition of µHA decreased the Ra of Zirconomer and CGIC, and increased the surface roughness of RMGI samples. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Glass Ionomer Cements 
690 |a Hydroxyapatites 
690 |a Surface Properties 
690 |a Biocompatible Materials 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Dentistry, Vol 17 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fid/article/view/3109 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2676-296X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/fe6fd6f58b0a409e843f96d92c6b0037  |z Connect to this object online.