Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Evidence for the relationship between maternal and perinatal factors and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is conflicting. We aimed to systematically analyze published data on maternal and fetal factors for successful VBAC. Methods A comprehensive search...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yanxin Wu (Author), Yachana Kataria (Author), Zilian Wang (Author), Wai-Kit Ming (Author), Christina Ellervik (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2019-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ff20db79aa494a02919e38d6f77cdafc
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Yanxin Wu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yachana Kataria  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Zilian Wang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Wai-Kit Ming  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Christina Ellervik  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2019-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12884-019-2517-y 
500 |a 1471-2393 
520 |a Abstract Background Evidence for the relationship between maternal and perinatal factors and the success of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) is conflicting. We aimed to systematically analyze published data on maternal and fetal factors for successful VBAC. Methods A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, from each database's inception to March 16, 2018. Observational studies, identifying women with a trial of labor after one previous low-transverse cesarean section were included. Two reviewers independently abstracted the data. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results We included 94 eligible observational studies (239,006 pregnant women with 163,502 VBAC). Factors were associated with successful VBAC with the following odds ratios (OR;95%CI): age (0.92;0.86-0.98), obesity (0.50;0.39-0.64), diabetes (0.50;0.42-0.60), hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy (HDCP) (0.54;0.44-0.67), Bishop score (3.77;2.17-6.53), labor induction (0.58;0.50-0.67), macrosomia (0.56;0.50-0.64), white race (1.39;1.26-1.54), previous vaginal birth before cesarean section (3.14;2.62-3.77), previous VBAC (4.71;4.33-5.12), the indications for the previous cesarean section (cephalopelvic disproportion (0.54;0.36-0.80), dystocia or failure to progress (0.54;0.41-0.70), failed induction (0.56;0.37-0.85), and fetal malpresentation (1.66;1.38-2.01)). Adjusted ORs were similar. Conclusions Diabetes, HDCP, Bishop score, labor induction, macrosomia, age, obesity, previous vaginal birth, and the indications for the previous CS should be considered as the factors affecting the success of VBAC. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Vaginal birth after cesarean section 
690 |a Trial of labor 
690 |a Delivery 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-019-2517-y 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2393 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ff20db79aa494a02919e38d6f77cdafc  |z Connect to this object online.