Methotrexate showed efficacy both in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, predictors of surgery were identified in patients initially treated with methotrexate monotherapy

• Main Authors: Mengyao Wang (Author), Jingwen Zhao (Author), Heran Wang (Author), Changqing Zheng (Author), Bing Chang (Author), Lixuan Sang (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2022-09-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 1663-9812; 10.3389/fphar.2022.996065
• Keywords: inflammatory bowel disease; methotrexate monotherapy; prognostic analysis; Crohn's disease; ulcerative colitis; Therapeutics. Pharmacology; RM1-950
• Source: Frontiers in Pharmacology, Vol 13 (2022)

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate methotrexate efficacy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), and identify predictors of surgery for patients who were initially treated with methotrexate monotherapy.Design: We performed a retrospective analysis of 34,860 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the IBD Bioresource (United Kingdom) prior to 9 November 2021. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with methotrexate efficacy. The data were randomly stratified into training and testing sets (7:3). Nomograms were developed based on Cox regression analysis outcomes. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability were determined using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves.Results: Overall, 1,042 patients (CD: 791, UC: 251) were included. Independent factors associated with effective methotrexate monotherapy were younger age at diagnosis, latest therapy period, exclusive upper gastrointestinal tract disease (for CD), and longer duration between diagnosis and methotrexate initiation (for UC). For CD, predictors in the nomogram were gender, treatment era, tolerance, lesion site, perianal involvement, disease behaviour, and biologics requirements (C-index: 0.711 and 0.732 for training and validation cohorts, respectively). For UC, the factors were age at diagnosis and sex (C-index: 0.784 and 0.690 for training and validation cohorts, respectively). Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between predictions and actual observations.