Comparison of the different voxel sizes in the estimation of peri-implant fenestration defects using cone beam computed tomography: an ex vivo study

Abstract Background To examine the influence of voxel sizes to detect of peri-implant fenestration defects on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and methods This study performed with three sheep heads both maxilla and mandible and two types of dental implant type 1 zirconium impl...

Cur síos iomlán

Sábháilte in:
Sonraí bibleagrafaíochta
Príomhchruthaitheoirí: Mehmet Hakan Kurt (Údar), Nilsun Bağış (Údar), Cengiz Evli (Údar), Cemal Atakan (Údar), Kaan Orhan (Údar)
Formáid: LEABHAR
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe: SpringerOpen, 2020-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Ábhair:
Rochtain ar líne:Connect to this object online.
Clibeanna: Cuir clib leis
Níl clibeanna ann, Bí ar an gcéad duine le clib a chur leis an taifead seo!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ff6f429e2f4e49bd93b9a4f735ea3dd4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Mehmet Hakan Kurt  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Nilsun Bağış  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cengiz Evli  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cemal Atakan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kaan Orhan  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparison of the different voxel sizes in the estimation of peri-implant fenestration defects using cone beam computed tomography: an ex vivo study 
260 |b SpringerOpen,   |c 2020-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s40729-020-00254-2 
500 |a 2198-4034 
520 |a Abstract Background To examine the influence of voxel sizes to detect of peri-implant fenestration defects on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and methods This study performed with three sheep heads both maxilla and mandible and two types of dental implant type 1 zirconium implant (Zr40) (n = 6) and type 2 titanium implant (Ti22) (n = 10). A total of 14 peri-implant fenestrations (8 buccal surfaces, 6 palatal/lingual surface) were created while 18 surfaces (8 buccal, 10 palatal/lingual) were free of fenestrations. Three observers have evaluated the images of fenestration at each site. Images obtained with 0.75 mm3, 0.100 mm3, 0.150 mm3, 0.200 mm3, and 0.400 mm3 voxel sizes. For intra- and inter-observer agreements for each voxel size, Kappa coefficients were calculated. Results Intra- and inter-observer kappa values were the highest for 0.150 mm3, and the lowest in 0.75 mm3 and 0.400 mm3 voxel sizes for all types of implants. The highest area under the curve (AUC) values were found higher for the scan mode of 0.150 mm3, whereas lower AUC values were found for the voxel size for 0.400 mm3. Titanium implants had higher AUC values than zirconium with the statistical significance for all voxel sizes (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusion A voxel size of 0.150 mm3 can be used to detect peri-implant fenestration bone defects. CBCT is the most reliable diagnostic tool for peri-implant fenestration bone defects. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Cone beam computed tomography 
690 |a Peri-implant fenestrations 
690 |a Implant 
690 |a Voxel size 
690 |a Medicine 
690 |a R 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Journal of Implant Dentistry, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020) 
787 0 |n http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40729-020-00254-2 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2198-4034 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ff6f429e2f4e49bd93b9a4f735ea3dd4  |z Connect to this object online.