Improvement of primary care for patients with chronic heart failure: a pilot study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Many patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) receive treatment in primary care, but data have shown that the quality of care for these patients needs to be improved. We aimed to evaluate the impact and feasibility of a programme fo...

সম্পূর্ণ বিবরণ

সংরক্ষণ করুন:
গ্রন্থ-পঞ্জীর বিবরন
প্রধান লেখক: Grol Richard (Author), Wensing Michel (Author), van Lieshout Jan (Author)
বিন্যাস: গ্রন্থ
প্রকাশিত: BMC, 2010-01-01T00:00:00Z.
বিষয়গুলি:
অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন:Connect to this object online.
ট্যাগগুলো: ট্যাগ যুক্ত করুন
কোনো ট্যাগ নেই, প্রথমজন হিসাবে ট্যাগ করুন!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ff749d18a9914df2b8c128c09e554e13
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Grol Richard  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Wensing Michel  |e author 
700 1 0 |a van Lieshout Jan  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Improvement of primary care for patients with chronic heart failure: a pilot study 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2010-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/1472-6963-10-8 
500 |a 1472-6963 
520 |a <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Many patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) receive treatment in primary care, but data have shown that the quality of care for these patients needs to be improved. We aimed to evaluate the impact and feasibility of a programme for improving primary care for patients with CHF.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>An observational study was performed in 19 general practices in the south-eastern part of the Netherlands, evaluation involving 15 general practitioners and 77 CHF patients. The programme for improvement comprised educational and organizational components and was delivered by a trained practice visitor to the practices. The evaluation was based on case registration forms completed by health professionals and telephone interviews.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Management relating to diet and physical exercise seemed to have improved as eight patients were referred to dieticians and five to physiotherapists. The seasonal influenza vaccination rate increased from 94% to 97% (75/77). No impact on smoking was observed. Pharmaceutical treatment was adjusted according to guideline recommendations in 12% of the patients (9/77); 7 patients started recommended medication and 2 patients received dosage adjustments. General practitioners perceived the programme to be feasible. Clinical task delegation to nurses and assistants increased in some practices, but collaboration with other healthcare providers remained limited.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The improvement programme proved to have moderate impact on patient care. Its effectiveness should be tested in a larger rigorous evaluation study using modifications based on the pilot experiences.</p> 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Health Services Research, Vol 10, Iss 1, p 8 (2010) 
787 0 |n http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/8 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6963 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ff749d18a9914df2b8c128c09e554e13  |z Connect to this object online.