"Why has this new vaccine come and for what reasons?" key antecedents and questions for acceptance of a future maternal GBS vaccine: Perspectives of pregnant women, lactating women, and community members in Kenya

ABSTRACTGroup B streptococcus (GBS) is a leading global cause of neonatal sepsis and meningitis, stillbirth, and puerperal sepsis. While intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) is a currently available GBS disease prevention strategy, IAP is programmatically complex to implement, precluding use in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rupali J. Limaye (Author), Prachi Singh (Author), Berhaun Fesshaye (Author), Clarice Lee (Author), Jessica Schue (Author), Ruth A. Karron (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Taylor & Francis Group, 2024-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ff7cf8faf2464f78b7ba85d68c1543c2
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Rupali J. Limaye  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Prachi Singh  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Berhaun Fesshaye  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Clarice Lee  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jessica Schue  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ruth A. Karron  |e author 
245 0 0 |a "Why has this new vaccine come and for what reasons?" key antecedents and questions for acceptance of a future maternal GBS vaccine: Perspectives of pregnant women, lactating women, and community members in Kenya 
260 |b Taylor & Francis Group,   |c 2024-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1080/21645515.2024.2314826 
500 |a 2164-554X 
500 |a 2164-5515 
520 |a ABSTRACTGroup B streptococcus (GBS) is a leading global cause of neonatal sepsis and meningitis, stillbirth, and puerperal sepsis. While intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) is a currently available GBS disease prevention strategy, IAP is programmatically complex to implement, precluding use in low- and middle-income countries. In Kenya, 2% of stillbirths are attributable to GBS infection. Two maternal GBS vaccines are in late-stage clinical development. However, licensure of a maternal GBS vaccine does not translate into reduction of disease. We conducted 28 in-depth interviews with pregnant people, lactating people, and community members across two counties in Kenya to better understand the attitudes and informational needs of primary vaccine beneficiaries. We identified two emerging themes from the data. The first focused on antecedents to maternal GBS vaccine acceptability. The most common antecedents focused on the vaccine's ability to protect the baby and/or the mother, followed by community sensitization before the vaccine was available. The second key theme focused on questions that would need to be addressed before someone could accept a maternal GBS vaccine. Three key categories of questions were identified, including vaccine safety compared to vaccine benefits, who gets the vaccine, and how the vaccine works. Realizing the potential benefits of a future GBS maternal vaccine will require a multifactorial approach, including ensuring that communities are aware of GBS-related harms as well as the safety and effectiveness of a maternal GBS vaccine. Our study contributes to informing this multifactorial approach by elucidating the attitudes and concerns of key populations. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Pregnant women 
690 |a lactating women 
690 |a group B streptococcus 
690 |a maternal immunization 
690 |a Kenya 
690 |a Immunologic diseases. Allergy 
690 |a RC581-607 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, Vol 20, Iss 1 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/21645515.2024.2314826 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2164-5515 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2164-554X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ff7cf8faf2464f78b7ba85d68c1543c2  |z Connect to this object online.