Evidence of inflated exclusive breastfeeding estimates from a clinical trial in Bangladesh

Abstract Suboptimal breastfeeding is a major cause of infant morbidity and mortality across the world. Inconsistent data has hampered quantification of this practice, however, limiting breastfeeding promotion efforts. As part of a clinical trial in Dhaka, Bangladesh, data was collected on breastfeed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas J. Roberts (Author), Yana E. Hoy-Schulz (Author), Kaniz Jannat (Author), Julie Parsonnet (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2018-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ffbb1ccd2cdd45ae8ad82d1a8d76cec9
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Thomas J. Roberts  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yana E. Hoy-Schulz  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kaniz Jannat  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Julie Parsonnet  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evidence of inflated exclusive breastfeeding estimates from a clinical trial in Bangladesh 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2018-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s13006-018-0179-4 
500 |a 1746-4358 
520 |a Abstract Suboptimal breastfeeding is a major cause of infant morbidity and mortality across the world. Inconsistent data has hampered quantification of this practice, however, limiting breastfeeding promotion efforts. As part of a clinical trial in Dhaka, Bangladesh, data was collected on breastfeeding patterns among 125 infants. Infants were ages 4 to 12 weeks (mean = 8.05, SD = 2.13) at the time of enrollment, and breastfeeding data were collected at 24 study visits during a twelve-week period. Breastfeeding status was assessed using the WHO-recommended "current status" (24-h recall) method. These data were used to calculate two measures: a longitudinal estimate of exclusive breastfeeding since birth and a simulated cross-sectional prevalence to approximate common data collection methods. Infants were then ranked based on their breastfeeding status at all study visits and grouped into quartiles and compared using hospitalization data recorded for all infants as part of the original study. These data showed large differences in estimates of exclusive breastfeeding behaviors when assessed longitudinally (8.8% exclusive breastfeeding) vs. calculating a cross-sectional prevalence (56.2% exclusive breastfeeding). Additionally, when infants were grouped by quartile of breastfeeding behavior and matched with hospitalization records, it was found that infants in the lowest quartile of breastfeeding behaviors were significantly more likely to be hospitalized than infants in the highest quartile. These results provide further evidence that current breastfeeding epidemiology studies may overestimate rates of exclusive breastfeeding. They also provide further evidence to support the significant infant health benefits from breastfeeding promotion. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01899378. Registered July 10, 2013. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Exclusive breastfeeding 
690 |a Breastfeeding promotion 
690 |a Measurement error 
690 |a Epidemiology 
690 |a Infant nutrition 
690 |a Pediatrics 
690 |a RJ1-570 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Breastfeeding Journal, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp 1-5 (2018) 
787 0 |n http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13006-018-0179-4 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1746-4358 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ffbb1ccd2cdd45ae8ad82d1a8d76cec9  |z Connect to this object online.