Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules
This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal frame...
Bewaard in:
Andere auteurs: | , |
---|---|
Formaat: | Elektronisch Hoofdstuk |
Taal: | Engels |
Gepubliceerd in: |
Cham
Springer Nature
2019
|
Reeks: | Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
|
Onderwerpen: | |
Online toegang: | OAPEN Library: download the publication OAPEN Library: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Voeg label toe
Geen labels, Wees de eerste die dit record labelt!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | oapen_2024_20_500_12657_23097 | ||
005 | 20200318 | ||
003 | oapen | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
008 | 20200318s2019 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
020 | |a 978-3-030-12520-2 | ||
040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2 |c doi | |
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
042 | |a dc | ||
072 | 7 | |a JP |2 bicssc | |
072 | 7 | |a LB |2 bicssc | |
072 | 7 | |a LBBZ |2 bicssc | |
072 | 7 | |a LNF |2 bicssc | |
072 | 7 | |a LNFB |2 bicssc | |
100 | 1 | |a Gless, Sabine |4 edt | |
700 | 1 | |a Richter, Thomas |4 edt | |
700 | 1 | |a Gless, Sabine |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Richter, Thomas |4 oth | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? |b A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules |
260 | |a Cham |b Springer Nature |c 2019 | ||
300 | |a 1 electronic resource (380 p.) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice | |
506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
520 | |a This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People's Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved. ; | ||
536 | |a Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung | ||
540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | ||
546 | |a English | ||
650 | 7 | |a Politics & government |2 bicssc | |
650 | 7 | |a International law |2 bicssc | |
650 | 7 | |a International criminal law |2 bicssc | |
650 | 7 | |a Criminal law & procedure |2 bicssc | |
650 | 7 | |a Criminal justice law |2 bicssc | |
653 | |a Law | ||
653 | |a Private international law | ||
653 | |a Conflict of laws | ||
653 | |a International criminal law | ||
653 | |a Criminal law | ||
653 | |a Criminal justice, Administration of | ||
653 | |a Social justice | ||
653 | |a Human rights | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/1ee8f936-1539-4397-a557-c886dcd49caa/1007061.pdf |7 0 |z OAPEN Library: download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/23097 |7 0 |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication |