Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules

This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal frame...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Gless, Sabine (Editor), Richter, Thomas (Editor)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Cham Springer Nature 2019
Series:Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_23097
005 20200318
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20200318s2019 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 978-3-030-12520-2 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JP  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a LB  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a LBBZ  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a LNF  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a LNFB  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Gless, Sabine  |4 edt 
700 1 |a Richter, Thomas  |4 edt 
700 1 |a Gless, Sabine  |4 oth 
700 1 |a Richter, Thomas  |4 oth 
245 1 0 |a Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial?  |b A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules 
260 |a Cham  |b Springer Nature  |c 2019 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (380 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People's Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved. ; 
536 |a Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Politics & government  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a International law  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a International criminal law  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Criminal law & procedure  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Criminal justice law  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Law 
653 |a Private international law 
653 |a Conflict of laws 
653 |a International criminal law 
653 |a Criminal law 
653 |a Criminal justice, Administration of 
653 |a Social justice 
653 |a Human rights 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/1ee8f936-1539-4397-a557-c886dcd49caa/1007061.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/23097  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication