The Communism of Thought

The Communism of Thought takes as its point of departure a passage in a letter from Dionys Mascolo to Gilles Deleuze: "I have called this communism of thought in the past. And I placed it under the auspices of Hölderlin, who may have only fled thought because he was unable to live it: 'The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Munro, Michael (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Brooklyn, NY punctum books 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_25558
005 20190326
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20190326s2014 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a P3.0059.1.00 
020 |a 9780615986968 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.21983/P3.0059.1.00  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a HPCF  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Munro, Michael  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a The Communism of Thought 
260 |a Brooklyn, NY  |b punctum books  |c 2014 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (90 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a The Communism of Thought takes as its point of departure a passage in a letter from Dionys Mascolo to Gilles Deleuze: "I have called this communism of thought in the past. And I placed it under the auspices of Hölderlin, who may have only fled thought because he was unable to live it: 'The life of the spirit between friends, the thoughts that form in the exchange of words, by writing or in person, are necessary to those who seek. Without that, we are by our own hands outside thought.'" What, in light of that imperative, is a correspondence? What is given to be understood by the word, let alone the phenomenon? What constitutes a correspondence? What occasions it? On what terms and according to what conditions may one enter into that exchange "necessary," in Hölderlin's words, "to those who seek"? Pursuant to what vicissitudes may it be conducted? And what end(s) might a correspondence come to have beyond the ostensible end that, to all appearances, it (inevitably) will be said to have had? 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Western philosophy, from c 1900 -  |2 bicssc 
653 |a philosophy 
653 |a correspondence 
653 |a friendship 
653 |a commentary 
653 |a Gilles Deleuze 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/e2542d3a-a501-4334-8006-976c8a520c1f/1004537.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/25558  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication