Difficult Folk? A Political History of Social Anthropology

How should we tell the histories of academic disciplines? All too often, the political and institutional dimensions of knowledge production are lost beneath the intellectual debates. This book redresses the balance. Written in a narrative style and drawing on archival sources and oral histories, it...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mills, David (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Berghahn Books 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_27517
005 20181101
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20181101s2008 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a j.ctv8mdn66 
020 |a 9781785336638;9781785336638 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.2307/j.ctv8mdn66  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JHM  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Mills, David  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Difficult Folk?  |b A Political History of Social Anthropology 
260 |b Berghahn Books  |c 2008 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a How should we tell the histories of academic disciplines? All too often, the political and institutional dimensions of knowledge production are lost beneath the intellectual debates. This book redresses the balance. Written in a narrative style and drawing on archival sources and oral histories, it depicts the complex pattern of personal and administrative relationships that shape scholarly worlds.Focusing on the field of social anthropology in twentieth-century Britain, this book describes individual, departmental and institutional rivalries over funding and influence. It examines the efforts of scholars such as Bronislaw Malinowski, Edward Evans-Pritchard and Max Gluckman to further their own visions for social anthropology. Did the future lie with the humanities or the social sciences, with addressing social problems or developing scholarly autonomy? This new history situates the discipline's rise within the post-war expansion of British universities and the challenges created by 
536 |a Knowledge Unlatched 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Anthropology  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Anthropology 
653 |a Twentieth Century Britain 
653 |a Social problems 
653 |a Scholarly autonomy 
653 |a Rivalries 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/6b45fc54-61e3-4334-99aa-5c3f0f882345/1002490.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/27517  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication