Der Abschreckungseffekt auf die Grundrechtsausübung Strukturen eines verfassungsrechtlichen Arguments
Julian Staben examines chilling effects, framed as deterrence-based lines of argument, in the jurisprudence of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (German Federal Constitutional Court) and compares them with the jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court. Chilling effects follow distinct patterns when it comes...
Na minha lista:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Recurso Electrónico Capítulo de Livro |
Publicado em: |
Mohr Siebeck
2017
|
Colecção: | Internet und Gesellschaft
|
Assuntos: | |
Acesso em linha: | OAPEN Library: download the publication OAPEN Library: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
Resumo: | Julian Staben examines chilling effects, framed as deterrence-based lines of argument, in the jurisprudence of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (German Federal Constitutional Court) and compares them with the jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court. Chilling effects follow distinct patterns when it comes to online behaviour and emerging digital practices and therefore call for their constitutional reassessment. Julian Staben's work enables a more methodologically reflective use of these arguments in the judicial discourse. |
---|---|
ISBN: | 9783161554889 |
Acesso: | Open Access |