The Superstitious Muse Thinking Russian Literature Mythopoetically

For several decades David Bethea has written authoritatively on the "mythopoetic thinking" that lies at the heart of classical Russian literature, especially Russian poetry. His theoretically informed essays and books have made a point of turning back to issues of intentionality and biogra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bethea, David (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Boston, MA Academic Studies Press 2009
Series:Studies in Russian and Slavic Literatures, Cultures, and History
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_30894
005 20180106
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20180106s2009 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a j.ctt1zxsj7q 
020 |a 9781618116789;9781618119186 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.2307/j.ctt1zxsj7q  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Bethea, David  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a The Superstitious Muse  |b Thinking Russian Literature Mythopoetically 
260 |a Boston, MA  |b Academic Studies Press  |c 2009 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Studies in Russian and Slavic Literatures, Cultures, and History 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a For several decades David Bethea has written authoritatively on the "mythopoetic thinking" that lies at the heart of classical Russian literature, especially Russian poetry. His theoretically informed essays and books have made a point of turning back to issues of intentionality and biography at a time when authorial agency seems under threat of "erasure" and the question of how writers, and poets in particular, live their lives through their art is increasingly moot. The lichnost' (personhood, psychic totality) of the given writer is all-important, argues Bethea, as it is that which combines the specifically biographical and the capaciously mythical in verbal units that speak simultaneously to different planes of being. Pushkin's Evgeny can be one incarnation of the poet himself and an Everyman rising up to challenge Peter's new world order; Brodsky can be, all at once, Dante and Mandelstam and himself, the exile paying an Orphic visit to Florence. 
536 |a Knowledge Unlatched 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode 
546 |a English 
653 |a Arts 
653 |a Literary Criticism 
653 |a Alexander Pushkin 
653 |a Russian literature 
653 |a Vladimir Nabokov 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/2363c7af-61ba-4db0-8c00-86e3b35896f4/641447.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/30894  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication