Negotiating Tradition - The pragmatics of international deliberations on Cultural Property

Communicative interactions in international negotiations on cultural property not only provide information about the emergence and proliferation of arguments, rhetorics, and registers, but also permit valuable insights into actors' positions, strategies and alliances. They significantly influen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Groth, Stefan (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Universitätsverlag Göttingen 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_32550
005 20161231
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20161231s2012 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a books.gup.608 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.4000/books.gup.608  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a J  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a JF  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a JFC  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Groth, Stefan,  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Negotiating Tradition - The pragmatics of international deliberations on Cultural Property 
260 |b Universitätsverlag Göttingen  |c 2012 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Communicative interactions in international negotiations on cultural property not only provide information about the emergence and proliferation of arguments, rhetorics, and registers, but also permit valuable insights into actors' positions, strategies and alliances. They significantly influence local and national practices and views related to cultural property debates. What can be gained from a deep analysis of the communicative patterns and strategies that actors engage in - the entailing text and talk of negotiations - is a better understanding of the process itself: how do different actors argue, what kind of strategies and rhetorics do they use, to which instruments and institutions do they refer, and in what way do actors react to each other? An analysis of communicative interactions contributes to the question of how international negotiations work. The analytic inclusion of sociolinguistic practices allows insights into positions, strategies, and perspectives pertaining to cultural property. By looking at not only what actors say, but also at how and in what contexts they do so, it is possible to make more accurate statements about their positions and perceptions in cultural property debates. As these communicative interactions influence outcomes considerably, an approach from linguistic anthropology is not only beneficial for an understanding of specific negotiations, but also for the analysis of broader cultural property issues. 
520 |a Communicative interactions in international negotiations on cultural property not only provide information about the emergence and proliferation of arguments, rhetorics, and registers, but also permit valuable insights into actors' positions, strategies and alliances. They significantly influence local and national practices and views related to cultural property debates. What can be gained from a deep analysis of the communicative patterns and strategies that actors engage in - the entailing text and talk of negotiations - is a better understanding of the process itself: how do different actors argue, what kind of strategies and rhetorics do they use, to which instruments and institutions do they refer, and in what way do actors react to each other? An analysis of communicative interactions contributes to the question of how international negotiations work. The analytic inclusion of sociolinguistic practices allows insights into positions, strategies, and perspectives pertaining to cultural property. By looking at not only what actors say, but also at how and in what contexts they do so, it is possible to make more accurate statements about their positions and perceptions in cultural property debates. As these communicative interactions influence outcomes considerably, an approach from linguistic anthropology is not only beneficial for an understanding of specific negotiations, but also for the analysis of broader cultural property issues. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f by-nd/3.0/de  |2 cc  |4 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/de 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Society & social sciences  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Society & culture: general  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Cultural studies  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Cultural Property 
653 |a Communicative Interactions 
653 |a Rhetorics 
653 |a Linguistic Anthropology 
653 |a European Union 
653 |a Indexicality 
653 |a Indigenous peoples 
653 |a Intellectual property 
653 |a Opening statement 
653 |a Pragmatics 
653 |a Speech community 
653 |a Traditional knowledge 
653 |a World Intellectual Property Organization 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/06649052-8e1d-4b58-ab79-10055be77305/610300.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32550  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication