Governing Failure Provisional Expertise and the Transformation of Global Development Finance

Jacqueline Best argues that the changes in International Monetary Fund, World Bank and donor policies in the 1990s, towards what some have called the 'Post-Washington Consensus,' were driven by an erosion of expert authority and an increasing preoccupation with policy failure. Failures suc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Best, Jacqueline (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Cambridge, UK - New York, USA Cambridge University Press 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_33438
005 20180627
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20180627s2014 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a CBO9781139542739 
020 |a 9781139542739 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.1017/CBO9781139542739  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a KCP  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Best, Jacqueline  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Governing Failure  |b Provisional Expertise and the Transformation of Global Development Finance 
260 |a Cambridge, UK - New York, USA  |b Cambridge University Press  |c 2014 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (288 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Jacqueline Best argues that the changes in International Monetary Fund, World Bank and donor policies in the 1990s, towards what some have called the 'Post-Washington Consensus,' were driven by an erosion of expert authority and an increasing preoccupation with policy failure. Failures such as the Asian financial crisis and the decades of despair in sub-Saharan Africa led these institutions to develop governance strategies designed to avoid failure: fostering country ownership, developing global standards, managing risk and vulnerability and measuring results. In contrast to the structural adjustment era when policymakers were confident that they had all the answers, the author argues that we are now in an era of provisional governance, in which key actors are aware of the possibility of failure even as they seek to inoculate themselves against it. This book considers the implications of this shift, asking if it is a positive change and whether it is sustainable. This title was made Open Access by libraries from around the world through Knowledge Unlatched. 
536 |a Knowledge Unlatched 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Political economy  |2 bicssc 
653 |a nongovernmental organisations 
653 |a economic assistance 
653 |a politics 
653 |a development banks 
653 |a economic development - finance 
653 |a corporate governance 
653 |a international devleopment policy 
653 |a Conditionality 
653 |a Good governance 
653 |a Structural adjustment 
653 |a World Bank 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/3f595bc1-7e59-4bd6-a922-d9672490d9fb/472457.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/33438  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication