Dignitas Voluntas - Vita - Überlegungen zur Sterbehilfe aus rechtshistorischer, interdisziplinärer und rechtsvergleichender Sicht Göttinger Antrittsvorlesung im Januar 2006

Contrary to the common constriction of the euthanasia-discussion on "self-determination at the end of life" Eva Schumann claims rethinking in dealing with seriously ill and dying people. To meet their needs in her view a comprehensive access to outpatient and inpatient palliative care faci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schumann, Eva (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Published: Universitätsverlag Göttingen 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_36889
005 20200415
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20200415s2006 xx |||||o ||| 0|deu d
020 |a gup2006-21 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.17875/gup2006-21  |c doi 
041 0 |a deu 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a L  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a JFME  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a LNF  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Schumann, Eva  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Dignitas  |b Voluntas - Vita - Überlegungen zur Sterbehilfe aus rechtshistorischer, interdisziplinärer und rechtsvergleichender Sicht Göttinger Antrittsvorlesung im Januar 2006 
260 |b Universitätsverlag Göttingen  |c 2006 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Contrary to the common constriction of the euthanasia-discussion on "self-determination at the end of life" Eva Schumann claims rethinking in dealing with seriously ill and dying people. To meet their needs in her view a comprehensive access to outpatient and inpatient palliative care facilities is recquired and also improvements of care in nursing homes as well as offers to improve the integration of members into care. These claims conclude the discussion between assistance in dying (indirect euthanasia), and assistance to die (active and passive euthanasia). Taking account historical, interdisciplinary and comparative law issues it is demonstrated that the formal legal distinction between the various case groups of euthanasia not sufficiently takes into account the social dimension of dying. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f by-nd/2.0/de/deed.de  |2 cc  |4 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/de/deed.de 
546 |a German 
650 7 |a Law  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Ethical issues: euthanasia & right to die  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Criminal law & procedure  |2 bicssc 
653 |a law 
653 |a euthanasia 
653 |a geriatric welfare 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/0829a889-fe3b-427b-9ccb-d9a26ed68e6a/dignitas.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/36889  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication