Surveilling masses and unveiling human rights Uneasy choices for the Strasbourg Court

In this inaugural address I will first discuss the procedures in front of the UK IPT in the 10 Human Rights Organisations case, followed by a short presentation of the applications against actions of UK intelligence agencies in Big Brother Watch and in Bureau of Investigative Journalism that were di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kosta, Eleni (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Tilburg Tilburg University Press 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_39468
005 20200608
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20200608s2017 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a L  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a L  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Kosta, Eleni  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Surveilling masses and unveiling human rights  |b Uneasy choices for the Strasbourg Court 
260 |a Tilburg  |b Tilburg University Press  |c 2017 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (72 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a In this inaugural address I will first discuss the procedures in front of the UK IPT in the 10 Human Rights Organisations case, followed by a short presentation of the applications against actions of UK intelligence agencies in Big Brother Watch and in Bureau of Investigative Journalism that were directly submitted to the ECtHR. I will then turn to the issue of admissibility in secret surveillance cases, where the victims cannot prove that they have been directly affected by the surveillance measures, and will analyse the protection afforded by the ECtHR in light of its recent case law. After a short presentation of Articles 8 and 10 ECHR this inaugural address will focus on the discussion of the requirements that are established in Article 8(2) ECHR that when satisfied, justify an interference with the right to privacy: legality, legitimacy and necessity. The penultimate section will assess the recent case law of the CJEU in blanket data retention and surveillance cases. Finally I will close this inaugural address with a summary of my main findings and will conclude with thoughts for further research that I intend to undertake in the coming years. 
536 |a Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 
540 |a All rights reserved  |4 http://oapen.org/content/about-rights 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a L  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Law  |2 bicssc 
653 |a human rights 
653 |a surveillance 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/e85a3ae4-6696-4449-9f39-51cd2e4d1953/SSRN-id3167723.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/39468  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication