Finding Consciousness The Neuroscience, Ethics, and Law of Severe Brain Damage

Modern medicine enables us to keep many people alive after they have suffered severe brain damage and show no reliable outward signs of consciousness. Many such patients are misdiagnosed as being in a permanent vegetative state when they are actually in a minimally conscious state. This mistake has...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (Editor)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 2016
Series:Oxford Series in Neuroscience, Law & Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_47840
005 20210414
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210414s2016 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a acprof:oso/9780190280307.001.0001 
020 |a 9780190280307 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190280307.001.0001  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a PSAN  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter  |4 edt 
700 1 |a Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter  |4 oth 
245 1 0 |a Finding Consciousness  |b The Neuroscience, Ethics, and Law of Severe Brain Damage 
260 |a Oxford  |b Oxford University Press  |c 2016 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Oxford Series in Neuroscience, Law & Philosophy 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Modern medicine enables us to keep many people alive after they have suffered severe brain damage and show no reliable outward signs of consciousness. Many such patients are misdiagnosed as being in a permanent vegetative state when they are actually in a minimally conscious state. This mistake has far-reaching implications for treatment and prognosis. To alleviate this problem, neuroscientists have recently developed new brain-scanning methods for detecting consciousness in some of these patients and even for asking them questions, including "Do you want to stay alive?" These new technological abilities raise many questions about what exactly these methods reveal (Is it really consciousness?), how reliable they are (Do they fail to detect consciousness in some patients who are conscious?), what these patients' lives are like (Do they feel pain?), what we should do for and to these patients (Should we let them die?), who should decide (Are these patients competent to decide for themselves?), and which policies should governments and hospitals enact (Which kinds of treatment should be made available?). All of these questions and more are addressed in this collection of original papers. The prominent contributors provide background information, survey the issues and positions, and take controversial stands from a wide variety of perspectives, including neuroscience and neurology, law and policy, and philosophy and ethics. This collection should interest not only academics but anyone who might suffer brain damage, which includes us all. 
540 |a All rights reserved  |4 http://oapen.org/content/about-rights 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Neurosciences  |2 bicssc 
653 |a consciousness, vegetative state, minimally conscious state, death, disability, pain, brain damage, neuroscience, fMRI, ethics 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/47840  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication