Enthymemes and Topoi in Dialogue The Use of Common Sense Reasoning in Conversation
In Enthymemes and Topoi in Dialogue, Ellen Breitholtz presents a novel and precise account of reasoning from an interactional perspective. The account draws on the concepts of enthymemes and topoi, originating in Aristotelian rhetoric and dialectic, and integrates these in a formal dialogue semantic...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Brill
2020
|
| Series: | Current Research in the Semantics / Pragmatics Interface
41 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | OAPEN Library: download the publication OAPEN Library: description of the publication |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | oapen_2024_20_500_12657_48310 | ||
| 005 | 20210422 | ||
| 003 | oapen | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
| 008 | 20210422s2020 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789004436794 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789004436794 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789004436787 | ||
| 040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/9789004436794 |c doi | |
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 072 | 7 | |a CFGA |2 bicssc | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Breitholtz, Ellen |4 auth | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Enthymemes and Topoi in Dialogue |b The Use of Common Sense Reasoning in Conversation |
| 260 | |b Brill |c 2020 | ||
| 300 | |a 1 electronic resource (161 p.) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Current Research in the Semantics / Pragmatics Interface |v 41 | |
| 506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
| 520 | |a In Enthymemes and Topoi in Dialogue, Ellen Breitholtz presents a novel and precise account of reasoning from an interactional perspective. The account draws on the concepts of enthymemes and topoi, originating in Aristotelian rhetoric and dialectic, and integrates these in a formal dialogue semantic account using TTR, a type theory with records. Argumentation analysis and formal approaches to reasoning often focus the logical validity of arguments on inferences made in discourse from a god's-eye perspective. In contrast, Breitholtz's account emphasises the individual perspectives of interlocutors and the function and acceptability of their reasoning in context. This provides an analysis of interactions where interlocutors have access to different topoi and therefore make different inferences. Readership: All interested in the pragmatics-rhetoric interface and in theories of meaning and coherence in dialogue and discourse. | ||
| 540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | ||
| 546 | |a English | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Semantics & pragmatics |2 bicssc | |
| 653 | |a Semantics & pragmatics | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/6a7a10b0-b745-4a8a-ab1f-d712db2db686/9789004436794.pdf |7 0 |z OAPEN Library: download the publication |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48310 |7 0 |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication |