Chapter 5 Addiction The belief oscillation hypothesis

In popular, philosophical and many scientific accounts of addiction, strong desires and other affective states carry a great deal of the explanatory burden. Much less of a role is given to cognitive states than to affective. But as Pickard and Ahmed (2016; see also Pickard 2016) note, addiction may...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Levy, Neil (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_48492
005 20210505
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210505s2019 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9781315689197 
020 |a 9781138909281 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JFFH  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Levy, Neil  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Chapter 5 Addiction  |b The belief oscillation hypothesis 
260 |b Taylor & Francis  |c 2019 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (10 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a In popular, philosophical and many scientific accounts of addiction, strong desires and other affective states carry a great deal of the explanatory burden. Much less of a role is given to cognitive states than to affective. But as Pickard and Ahmed (2016; see also Pickard 2016) note, addiction may be as much or more a disorder of cognition as of compulsion or desire. Pickard's focus is on denial. In this chapter my focus will be different. I will argue that in many cases at least, we can explain the lapses of abstinent addicts by way of processes that do not involve motivated reasoning (as denial or self-deception plausibly do). Mechanisms that have the role of updating beliefs in response to evidence may alter addicts' judgments concerning what they have most reason to do (in the precise circumstances in which they find themselves), and thereby cause them to act accordingly 
536 |a Wellcome Trust 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Illness & addiction: social aspects  |2 bicssc 
653 |a addiction 
773 1 0 |t The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy and Science of Addiction  |7 nnaa  |o OAPEN Library UUID: 2186a634-f836-44b4-aa04-03eff710ce54 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/51d60a7a-d9b8-44e6-aca2-efc3a0d15dcf/Bookshelf_NBK540394.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/48492  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication