Semantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie Interpretationsbesonderheiten bei Komplementreduktionen lexikalischer Einheiten
Transitive verbs can often leave their arguments implicit. Until now, the objectless variants of these verbs have been frequently associated with specific meanings. This volume demonstrates that most verbs have different interpretations with different valency frames and specific conditions for omiss...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
| Published: |
Berlin/Boston
De Gruyter
2021
|
| Series: | Linguistik - Impulse & Tendenzen
91 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | OAPEN Library: download the publication OAPEN Library: description of the publication |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | oapen_2024_20_500_12657_50228 | ||
| 005 | 20210726 | ||
| 003 | oapen | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
| 008 | 20210726s2021 xx |||||o ||| 0|deu d | ||
| 020 | |a 9783110726268 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783110726268 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783110726831 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783110726374 | ||
| 040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9783110726268 |c doi | |
| 041 | 0 | |a deu | |
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 072 | 7 | |a CF |2 bicssc | |
| 072 | 7 | |a CFGA |2 bicssc | |
| 072 | 7 | |a CFK |2 bicssc | |
| 100 | 1 | |a von der Becke, Tanja |4 auth | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Semantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie |b Interpretationsbesonderheiten bei Komplementreduktionen lexikalischer Einheiten |
| 260 | |a Berlin/Boston |b De Gruyter |c 2021 | ||
| 300 | |a 1 electronic resource (355 p.) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Linguistik - Impulse & Tendenzen |v 91 | |
| 506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
| 520 | |a Transitive verbs can often leave their arguments implicit. Until now, the objectless variants of these verbs have been frequently associated with specific meanings. This volume demonstrates that most verbs have different interpretations with different valency frames and specific conditions for omission. Accordingly, statements about omission and their semantic consequences must be applied to the interpretations of a verb. | ||
| 540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | ||
| 546 | |a German | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a linguistics |2 bicssc | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Semantics & pragmatics |2 bicssc | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Grammar, syntax & morphology |2 bicssc | |
| 653 | |a Argument omission | ||
| 653 | |a polysemy | ||
| 653 | |a verb valency | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/690f613d-446b-4af4-8ad0-8a4fea9a3211/9783110726268.pdf |7 0 |z OAPEN Library: download the publication |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/50228 |7 0 |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication |