Chapter 15 Epistemic Gains and Epistemic Games Reliability and Higher Order Evidence in Medicine and Pharmacology
In this paper I analyse the dissent around evidence standards in medicine and pharmacology as a result of distinct ways to address epistemic losses in our game with nature and the scientific ecosystem: an "elitist" and a "pluralist" approach. The former is focused on reliability...
Tallennettuna:
Päätekijä: | |
---|---|
Aineistotyyppi: | Elektroninen Kirjan osa |
Kieli: | englanti |
Julkaistu: |
Springer Nature
2020
|
Aiheet: | |
Linkit: | OAPEN Library: download the publication OAPEN Library: description of the publication |
Tagit: |
Lisää tagi
Ei tageja, Lisää ensimmäinen tagi!
|
Yhteenveto: | In this paper I analyse the dissent around evidence standards in medicine and pharmacology as a result of distinct ways to address epistemic losses in our game with nature and the scientific ecosystem: an "elitist" and a "pluralist" approach. The former is focused on reliability as minimisation of random and systematic error, and is grounded on a categorical approach to causal assessment, whereas the latter is more focused on the high context-sensitivity of causation in medicine and in the soft sciences in general, and favours probabilistic approaches to scientific inference, as better equipped for defeasibility of causal inference in such domains. I then present a system for probabilistic causal assessment from heterogenous evidence that makes justice of concerns from both positions, while also incorporating "higher order evidence" (evidence/information about the evidence itself) in hypothesis confirmation. |
---|---|
Ulkoasu: | 1 electronic resource (28 p.) |
ISBN: | 978-3-030-29179-2_15 9783030291785 |
Pääsy: | Open Access |