Chapter 15 Epistemic Gains and Epistemic Games Reliability and Higher Order Evidence in Medicine and Pharmacology
In this paper I analyse the dissent around evidence standards in medicine and pharmacology as a result of distinct ways to address epistemic losses in our game with nature and the scientific ecosystem: an "elitist" and a "pluralist" approach. The former is focused on reliability...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Nature
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | OAPEN Library: download the publication OAPEN Library: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | oapen_2024_20_500_12657_50312 | ||
005 | 20210804 | ||
003 | oapen | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
008 | 20210804s2020 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
020 | |a 978-3-030-29179-2_15 | ||
020 | |a 9783030291785 | ||
040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/978-3-030-29179-2_15 |c doi | |
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
042 | |a dc | ||
072 | 7 | |a MMG |2 bicssc | |
100 | 1 | |a Osimani, Barbara |4 auth | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Chapter 15 Epistemic Gains and Epistemic Games |b Reliability and Higher Order Evidence in Medicine and Pharmacology |
260 | |b Springer Nature |c 2020 | ||
300 | |a 1 electronic resource (28 p.) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
520 | |a In this paper I analyse the dissent around evidence standards in medicine and pharmacology as a result of distinct ways to address epistemic losses in our game with nature and the scientific ecosystem: an "elitist" and a "pluralist" approach. The former is focused on reliability as minimisation of random and systematic error, and is grounded on a categorical approach to causal assessment, whereas the latter is more focused on the high context-sensitivity of causation in medicine and in the soft sciences in general, and favours probabilistic approaches to scientific inference, as better equipped for defeasibility of causal inference in such domains. I then present a system for probabilistic causal assessment from heterogenous evidence that makes justice of concerns from both positions, while also incorporating "higher order evidence" (evidence/information about the evidence itself) in hypothesis confirmation. | ||
536 | |a H2020 European Research Council | ||
540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | ||
546 | |a English | ||
650 | 7 | |a Pharmacology |2 bicssc | |
653 | |a Uncertainty Management in Pharmacology, Causality,Medical Epistemology, evidence standards, random error, systematic error, extrapolation, relevance, bias | ||
773 | 1 | 0 | |t Uncertainty in Pharmacology |7 nnaa |o OAPEN Library UUID: 6dde7ba1-8654-4ccc-9249-6bef6c837290 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/4605ca26-3da4-4cf1-87fb-288f1a6e1b16/Osimani_2020 Epi Games.pdf |7 0 |z OAPEN Library: download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/50312 |7 0 |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication |