Chapter 8 How Being Better Off Is Bad for You Implications for Distribution, Relational Equality, and an Egalitarian Ethos

In this chapter Fourie identifies and systematizes the impairments associated with having privilege, and evaluates their implications for theories of relational equality and distributive justice. Having certain social privileges, for example being a man in a patriarchal society, can also be damaging...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fourie, Carina (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_50844
005 20211006
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20211006s2022 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9780367823344-8 
020 |a 9780367416898 
020 |a 9781032122878 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.4324/9780367823344-8  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a HP  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a HPS  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Fourie, Carina  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Chapter 8 How Being Better Off Is Bad for You  |b Implications for Distribution, Relational Equality, and an Egalitarian Ethos 
260 |b Taylor & Francis  |c 2022 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (27 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a In this chapter Fourie identifies and systematizes the impairments associated with having privilege, and evaluates their implications for theories of relational equality and distributive justice. Having certain social privileges, for example being a man in a patriarchal society, can also be damaging; in other words, there are "impairments of privilege". Fourie delineates six kinds of impairments-epistemic, evaluative, emotional, health-related, affiliative, and moral. She then goes on to assess the implications of the impairments of privilege for two theories in political philosophy. Relational egalitarianism, she argues, has the theoretical resources to identify and address the problems associated with these impairments, whereas distributive egalitarianism does not. Furthermore, she argues that assessing the impairments of privilege through relational egalitarianism helps to characterize a society of equals: we must address the causes of functional impairments, express respect for the worse off by not normalizing the experiences of the privileged, and minimize competitive positionality. 
536 |a University of Washington 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Philosophy  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Social & political philosophy  |2 bicssc 
653 |a philosophy, autonomy, feminist philosophy, political philosophy, ethics, equity, social philosophy 
773 1 0 |t Autonomy and Equality  |7 nnaa  |o OAPEN Library UUID: 0eea1961-f566-49a2-8516-37f235e3d6e3 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/3f50b94b-fa9a-4500-ab03-f305dcce37f5/9780367823344.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/50844  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication