Oswald Mathias Ungers and Rem Koolhaas Recalibrating Architecture in the 1970s
Lara Schrijver examines the work of Oswald Mathias Ungers and Rem Koolhaas as intellectual legacy of the 1970s for architecture today. Particularly in the United States, this period focused on the autonomy of architecture as a correction to the social orientation of the 1960s. Yet, these two archite...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Bielefeld
transcript Verlag
2021
|
| Series: | Architekturen
63 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | OAPEN Library: download the publication OAPEN Library: description of the publication |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | oapen_2024_20_500_12657_51231 | ||
| 005 | 20211102 | ||
| 003 | oapen | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
| 008 | 20211102s2021 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9783839457597 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783839457597 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783837657593 | ||
| 040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9783839457597 |c doi | |
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 072 | 7 | |a AM |2 bicssc | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Schrijver, Lara |4 auth | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Oswald Mathias Ungers and Rem Koolhaas |b Recalibrating Architecture in the 1970s |
| 260 | |a Bielefeld |b transcript Verlag |c 2021 | ||
| 300 | |a 1 electronic resource (206 p.) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Architekturen |v 63 | |
| 506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
| 520 | |a Lara Schrijver examines the work of Oswald Mathias Ungers and Rem Koolhaas as intellectual legacy of the 1970s for architecture today. Particularly in the United States, this period focused on the autonomy of architecture as a correction to the social orientation of the 1960s. Yet, these two architects pioneered a more situated autonomy, initiating an intellectual discourse on architecture that was inherently design-based. Their work provides room for interpreting social conditions and disciplinary formal developments, thus constructing a `plausible' relationship between the two that allows the life within to flourish and adapt. In doing so, they provide a foundation for recalibrating architecture today. | ||
| 540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | ||
| 546 | |a English | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Architecture |2 bicssc | |
| 653 | |a Architecture Theory | ||
| 653 | |a Urbanism | ||
| 653 | |a Culture | ||
| 653 | |a 1970s | ||
| 653 | |a Architecture | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/3dd47efd-93b4-42c1-9f3a-b19151eaf044/9783839457597.pdf |7 0 |z OAPEN Library: download the publication |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/51231 |7 0 |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication |