The Teleological and Kalam Cosmological Arguments Revisited

A prominent issue in many contemporary philosophy of religion debates concerns whether the universe has a Designer. This book moves the discussion ahead in a significant way by devising an original deductive formulation of the Teleological Argument (TA) which demonstrates that the following are the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Loke, Andrew (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Cham Springer Nature 2022
Series:Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_54428
005 20220513
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20220513s2022 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 978-3-030-94403-2 
020 |a 9783030944032 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-030-94403-2  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a HRAB  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a PDA  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a HPJ  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Loke, Andrew  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a The Teleological and Kalam Cosmological Arguments Revisited 
260 |a Cham  |b Springer Nature  |c 2022 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (387 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a A prominent issue in many contemporary philosophy of religion debates concerns whether the universe has a Designer. This book moves the discussion ahead in a significant way by devising an original deductive formulation of the Teleological Argument (TA) which demonstrates that the following are the only possible categories of hypotheses concerning fine-tuning and order: (i) chance, (ii) regularity, (iii) combinations of regularity and chance, (iv) uncaused, and (v) design. This book also demonstrates that there are essential features of each category such that, while the alternatives to design are unlikely, the Design Hypothesis is not, and that one can argue for design by exclusion without having to first assign a prior probability for design. By combining the TA with the Kalam Cosmological Argument (KCA) which it defends against various objections, this book responds to the God-of-the-gaps objection by demonstrating that the conclusion of the KCA-TA is not based on gaps which can be filled by further scientific progress, but follows from deduction and exclusion. This is an open access book. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Philosophy of religion  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Philosophy of science  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Philosophy: metaphysics & ontology  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Ultimate Designer 
653 |a Cosmology 
653 |a Causation 
653 |a Fine-Tuning 
653 |a First Cause 
653 |a Laws of Nature 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/7fdd13ea-056e-413c-9104-293f951f125b/978-3-030-94403-2.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/54428  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication