Homo oeconomicus. Paradigma, critiche, revisioni
Pantaleoni and Pareto re-established economic theory on the basis of homo oeconomicus which, despite criticisms, went on to become a strangely popular concept, not only among economists, but even in common parlance, where it has assumed a confusing variety of meanings. With a view to setting things...
Bewaard in:
Hoofdauteur: | |
---|---|
Formaat: | Elektronisch Hoofdstuk |
Taal: | Italiaans |
Gepubliceerd in: |
Firenze
Firenze University Press
2012
|
Reeks: | Studi e saggi
103 |
Onderwerpen: | |
Online toegang: | OAPEN Library: download the publication OAPEN Library: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Voeg label toe
Geen labels, Wees de eerste die dit record labelt!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | oapen_2024_20_500_12657_55064 | ||
005 | 20220531 | ||
003 | oapen | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
008 | 20220531s2012 xx |||||o ||| 0|ita d | ||
020 | |a 978-88-6655-107-2 | ||
020 | |a 9788866551072 | ||
020 | |a 9788855189248 | ||
020 | |a 9788866551058 | ||
020 | |a 9788866551096 | ||
040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.36253/978-88-6655-107-2 |c doi | |
041 | 0 | |a ita | |
042 | |a dc | ||
072 | 7 | |a HPS |2 bicssc | |
100 | 1 | |a CARUSO, SERGIO |4 auth | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Homo oeconomicus. Paradigma, critiche, revisioni |
260 | |a Firenze |b Firenze University Press |c 2012 | ||
300 | |a 1 electronic resource (194 p.) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Studi e saggi |v 103 | |
506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
520 | |a Pantaleoni and Pareto re-established economic theory on the basis of homo oeconomicus which, despite criticisms, went on to become a strangely popular concept, not only among economists, but even in common parlance, where it has assumed a confusing variety of meanings. With a view to setting things in order, this book distinguishes: the methodological hypotheses, which could possibly be corrected on the basis of new economic psychology; the weak anthropologies, retrievable as 'given abstractions' within typical contexts; and finally the extreme versions, that reduce human nature to absolute egoism. The author makes a radical criticism of the latter, drawing upon the extensive tools derived from psychology, philosophical anthropology and political philosophy, and thus succeeds in demonstrating their lack of empirical foundation, their conceptual inconsistency and their ideological dangerousness. | ||
540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | ||
546 | |a Italian | ||
650 | 7 | |a Social & political philosophy |2 bicssc | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/f2510495-f630-4868-9426-a55fc08a3f45/9788866551072.pdf |7 0 |z OAPEN Library: download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/55064 |7 0 |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication |