Homo oeconomicus. Paradigma, critiche, revisioni

Pantaleoni and Pareto re-established economic theory on the basis of homo oeconomicus which, despite criticisms, went on to become a strangely popular concept, not only among economists, but even in common parlance, where it has assumed a confusing variety of meanings. With a view to setting things...

Volledige beschrijving

Bewaard in:
Bibliografische gegevens
Hoofdauteur: CARUSO, SERGIO (auth)
Formaat: Elektronisch Hoofdstuk
Taal:Italiaans
Gepubliceerd in: Firenze Firenze University Press 2012
Reeks:Studi e saggi 103
Onderwerpen:
Online toegang:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Voeg label toe
Geen labels, Wees de eerste die dit record labelt!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_55064
005 20220531
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20220531s2012 xx |||||o ||| 0|ita d
020 |a 978-88-6655-107-2 
020 |a 9788866551072 
020 |a 9788855189248 
020 |a 9788866551058 
020 |a 9788866551096 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.36253/978-88-6655-107-2  |c doi 
041 0 |a ita 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a HPS  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a CARUSO, SERGIO  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Homo oeconomicus. Paradigma, critiche, revisioni 
260 |a Firenze  |b Firenze University Press  |c 2012 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (194 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Studi e saggi  |v 103 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Pantaleoni and Pareto re-established economic theory on the basis of homo oeconomicus which, despite criticisms, went on to become a strangely popular concept, not only among economists, but even in common parlance, where it has assumed a confusing variety of meanings. With a view to setting things in order, this book distinguishes: the methodological hypotheses, which could possibly be corrected on the basis of new economic psychology; the weak anthropologies, retrievable as 'given abstractions' within typical contexts; and finally the extreme versions, that reduce human nature to absolute egoism. The author makes a radical criticism of the latter, drawing upon the extensive tools derived from psychology, philosophical anthropology and political philosophy, and thus succeeds in demonstrating their lack of empirical foundation, their conceptual inconsistency and their ideological dangerousness. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a Italian 
650 7 |a Social & political philosophy  |2 bicssc 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/f2510495-f630-4868-9426-a55fc08a3f45/9788866551072.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/55064  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication