Legalità e mutamenti giurisprudenziali nel diritto penale Fondamento e limiti del divieto di retroattività dei mutamenti giurisprudenziali sfavorevoli
Over the past several years, constitutional, supreme and human rights courts had to deal with the problem of adjudicative retroactivity in criminal law with ever-greater intensity. Following the case Contrada c. Italie, in which the European Court of Human Rights found a violation of the legality pr...
Furkejuvvon:
| Váldodahkki: | |
|---|---|
| Materiálatiipa: | Elektrovnnalaš Girjji oassi |
| Giella: | itáliagiella |
| Almmustuhtton: |
Florence
Firenze University Press
2021
|
| Ráidu: | Premio Tesi di Dottorato
90 |
| Fáttát: | |
| Liŋkkat: | OAPEN Library: download the publication OAPEN Library: description of the publication |
| Fáddágilkorat: |
Lasit fáddágilkoriid
Eai fáddágilkorat, Lasit vuosttaš fáddágilkora!
|
| Čoahkkáigeassu: | Over the past several years, constitutional, supreme and human rights courts had to deal with the problem of adjudicative retroactivity in criminal law with ever-greater intensity. Following the case Contrada c. Italie, in which the European Court of Human Rights found a violation of the legality principle under Art. 7 due to an unforeseeable retrospective application of a judicially created criminal offence, the issue of citizens' safeguard upon an overruling occurrence is even more in the foreground. What temporal effect is best given to an unfavorable overruling decision? Should its application be limited to acts and conduct occurring after it or should it operate retrospectively and subject to criminal responsibility those who, acting in reliance on an earlier decision, did only what courts declared to be lawful? A limited prohibition of adjudicative retroactivity in criminal law seems to help foster an up-to-date relationship between the individual and the state. |
|---|---|
| Olgguldas hápmi: | 1 electronic resource (288 p.) |
| ISBN: | 978-88-5518-368-0 9788855183680 9788855183673 9788855183697 |
| Beassan: | Open Access |