Legalità e mutamenti giurisprudenziali nel diritto penale Fondamento e limiti del divieto di retroattività dei mutamenti giurisprudenziali sfavorevoli

Over the past several years, constitutional, supreme and human rights courts had to deal with the problem of adjudicative retroactivity in criminal law with ever-greater intensity. Following the case Contrada c. Italie, in which the European Court of Human Rights found a violation of the legality pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Galante, Andrea (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:Italian
Published: Florence Firenze University Press 2021
Series:Premio Tesi di Dottorato 90
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_55690
005 20220531
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20220531s2021 xx |||||o ||| 0|ita d
020 |a 978-88-5518-368-0 
020 |a 9788855183680 
020 |a 9788855183673 
020 |a 9788855183697 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.36253/978-88-5518-368-0  |c doi 
041 0 |a ita 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a LNF  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Galante, Andrea  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Legalità e mutamenti giurisprudenziali nel diritto penale  |b Fondamento e limiti del divieto di retroattività dei mutamenti giurisprudenziali sfavorevoli 
260 |a Florence  |b Firenze University Press  |c 2021 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (288 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Premio Tesi di Dottorato  |v 90 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Over the past several years, constitutional, supreme and human rights courts had to deal with the problem of adjudicative retroactivity in criminal law with ever-greater intensity. Following the case Contrada c. Italie, in which the European Court of Human Rights found a violation of the legality principle under Art. 7 due to an unforeseeable retrospective application of a judicially created criminal offence, the issue of citizens' safeguard upon an overruling occurrence is even more in the foreground. What temporal effect is best given to an unfavorable overruling decision? Should its application be limited to acts and conduct occurring after it or should it operate retrospectively and subject to criminal responsibility those who, acting in reliance on an earlier decision, did only what courts declared to be lawful? A limited prohibition of adjudicative retroactivity in criminal law seems to help foster an up-to-date relationship between the individual and the state. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a Italian 
650 7 |a Criminal law & procedure  |2 bicssc 
653 |a criminal law 
653 |a legality principle 
653 |a adjudicative retroactivity 
653 |a prospective overruling 
653 |a mistake of law 
653 |a foreseeability 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/d135e6f2-fb59-4bee-97c3-f34a895a4c54/9788855183680.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/55690  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication