Chapter Online Critical Debate Model: Deliberation for the Digital Age
Through our experience during a large-scale public engagement exercise in Chile we draw conclusions to adapt and improve the Critical Debate Model to an online format. We highlight the importance of epistemic opposition and structured annotation for the execution of debates, while also exploring the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Florence
Firenze University Press
2021
|
| Series: | Communication and Philosophical Cultures. Researches and Instruments
1 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | OAPEN Library: download the publication OAPEN Library: description of the publication |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | oapen_2024_20_500_12657_56405 | ||
| 005 | 20220601 | ||
| 003 | oapen | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
| 008 | 20220601s2021 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 978-88-5518-329-1.08 | ||
| 020 | |a 9788855183291 | ||
| 040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.08 |c doi | |
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fuentes Bravo, Claudio |4 auth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Goñi Jerez, Julián |4 auth | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Chapter Online Critical Debate Model: Deliberation for the Digital Age |
| 260 | |a Florence |b Firenze University Press |c 2021 | ||
| 300 | |a 1 electronic resource (18 p.) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Communication and Philosophical Cultures. Researches and Instruments |v 1 | |
| 506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
| 520 | |a Through our experience during a large-scale public engagement exercise in Chile we draw conclusions to adapt and improve the Critical Debate Model to an online format. We highlight the importance of epistemic opposition and structured annotation for the execution of debates, while also exploring the possibilities of automated analysis using Natural Language Processing. We conclude by describing how an online version of the Critical Debate Model could be implemented. | ||
| 540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | ||
| 546 | |a English | ||
| 653 | |a Online Debate | ||
| 653 | |a Deliberative Debate | ||
| 653 | |a Critical Debate Model | ||
| 773 | 1 | 0 | |7 nnaa |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/576347a7-61cf-411c-a3f1-9ae88737bf1f/26107.pdf |7 0 |z OAPEN Library: download the publication |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/56405 |7 0 |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication |