Diálogos Sur-Sur Reflexiones sobre el sur, las desigualdades epistémicas y la democratización global de los saberes

One of the keys to understanding global inequalities and seeking ways to overcome them is to accept and develop a theoretical assumption: the euphemistically called global "asymmetries" are not only economic or geopolitical. They are equally symbolic. This is where the debates on epistemic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Devés, Eduardo (Editor), Pereira da Silva, Fabricio (Editor), Ngoie Tshibambe, Germain (Editor), Baltar, Paula (Editor)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:Spanish
Published: Santiago, Chile Ariadna Ediciones 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_59881
005 20221208
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20221208s2022 xx |||||o ||| 0|spa d
020 |a ae9789566095712.56 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.26448/ae9789566095712.56  |c doi 
041 0 |a spa 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JFC  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Devés, Eduardo  |4 edt 
700 1 |a Pereira da Silva, Fabricio  |4 edt 
700 1 |a Ngoie Tshibambe, Germain  |4 edt 
700 1 |a Baltar, Paula  |4 edt 
700 1 |a Devés, Eduardo  |4 oth 
700 1 |a Pereira da Silva, Fabricio  |4 oth 
700 1 |a Ngoie Tshibambe, Germain  |4 oth 
700 1 |a Baltar, Paula  |4 oth 
245 1 0 |a Diálogos Sur-Sur  |b Reflexiones sobre el sur, las desigualdades epistémicas y la democratización global de los saberes 
260 |a Santiago, Chile  |b Ariadna Ediciones  |c 2022 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (265 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a One of the keys to understanding global inequalities and seeking ways to overcome them is to accept and develop a theoretical assumption: the euphemistically called global "asymmetries" are not only economic or geopolitical. They are equally symbolic. This is where the debates on epistemic dependency (Beigel, 2013) and the coloniality of knowledge (2000) are located, the reflections on "epistemic violence" and "epistemicides" (Spivak, 1988, Santos, Meneses, 2009), on the subject colonial and postcolonial (Césaire, 2004, Fanon, 1966, Hall, 2015) and, in particular, on the role of the "peripheral intellectual" and the production of knowledge in the "Sures" (Devés, 2017). In fact, it is perceived that peripheral knowledge and knowledge have less legitimacy than central knowledge and are frequently not considered "science" or "theory". Their proposals do not circulate or circulate little and tend to disappear over time. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a Spanish 
650 7 |a Cultural studies  |2 bicssc 
653 |a South-South Studies; epistemic differences; periphery, Studies of ideas 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/c2bfe336-06ee-4e95-8ebc-93a352d54495/978-956-6095-71-2.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/59881  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication