States of exclusion A critical systems theory reading of international law

The theoretical underpinnings of public international law have taken the sovereign status of the nation-state for granted since the beginning of the modern era. After centuries of evolution in legal and political thought, the state's definition as a bounded territorial unit has been strictly co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Buitendag, Nicolaas (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Capetown AOSIS 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_63051
005 20230522
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20230522s2022 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a aosis.2022.BK319 
020 |a 9781779952394 
020 |a 9781779952400 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.4102/aosis.2022.BK319  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a LAQ  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Buitendag, Nicolaas  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a States of exclusion  |b A critical systems theory reading of international law 
260 |a Capetown  |b AOSIS  |c 2022 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (232 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a The theoretical underpinnings of public international law have taken the sovereign status of the nation-state for granted since the beginning of the modern era. After centuries of evolution in legal and political thought, the state's definition as a bounded territorial unit has been strictly codified. The legal development of the nation-state was an ideological project informed by extra-legal considerations. Additionally, the ever-narrowing scope of the juridical idea of sovereignty functioned as a boundary mechanism instrumental in colonising Africa and other regions. While international law claims universal liberalism today, the current system based on sovereign nation-states represents not social inclusion but fierce and dangerous exclusion. The central thesis of this book is that the development of legal sovereignty was, rather than part of the modernist progress narrative, a historically contingent evolutionary regression. While other social systems such as economics and science became globalised, politics and law counterintuitively became more territorialised. It is argued that the nation-state today is not only anachronistic but is dangerously ill-equipped for facing international problems such as the climate crisis or global pandemics. Finally, it also leaves African states and many other formerly-colonised territories at a particular disadvantage by regulating their political practices into a predefined mould. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Law & society  |2 bicssc 
653 |a International law;systems theory;legal theory;legal sociology;Niklas Luhmann;colonialism;nation states;law 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/851aba85-29c3-4ddd-bfa3-66bebd40d236/BK319-WebPDF.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/63051  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication