Constituting Works, Protecting Women Gender, Law, and Labor in the Progressive Era and New Deal Years

Constitutional considerations of protective laws for women were the analytical battlefield on which the legal community reworked the balance between private liberty and the state's authority to regulate. Julie Novkov focuses on the importance of gender as an analytical category for the legal sy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Novkov, Julie (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Ann Arbor University of Michigan Press 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_64145
005 20230727
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20230727s2001 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a mpub.17391 
020 |a 9780472904211 
020 |a 9780472111985 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.3998/mpub.17391  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JFSJ  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Novkov, Julie  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Constituting Works, Protecting Women  |b Gender, Law, and Labor in the Progressive Era and New Deal Years 
260 |a Ann Arbor  |b University of Michigan Press  |c 2001 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Constitutional considerations of protective laws for women were the analytical battlefield on which the legal community reworked the balance between private liberty and the state's authority to regulate. Julie Novkov focuses on the importance of gender as an analytical category for the legal system. During the Progressive Era and New Deal, courts often invalidated generalized protective legislation, but frequently upheld measures that limited women's terms and conditions of labor. The book explores the reasoning in such cases that were decided between 1873 and 1937. By analyzing all reported opinion on the state and federal level, as well as materials from the women's movement and briefs filed in the U.S. Supreme Court, the study demonstrates that considerations of cases involving women's measures ultimately came to drive the development of doctrine. The study combines historical institutionalism and feminism to address constitutional interpretation, showing that an analysis of conflict over the meaning of legal categories provides a deeper understanding of constitutional development. In doing so, it rejects purely political interpretations of the so-called Lochner era, in which the courts invalidated many legislative efforts to ameliorate the worst effects of capitalism. By addressing the dynamic interactions among interested laypersons, attorneys, and judges, it demonstrates that no individuals or institutions have complete control over the generation of constitutional meaning. 
536 |a Big Ten Academic Alliance 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Gender studies, gender groups  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Law 
653 |a History - American History 
653 |a Political Science - American Politics 
653 |a Gender Studies - Women's Studies 
653 |a Class Studies 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/86f24693-255d-473a-b465-92daaf897ae6/9780472904211.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/dcb22cd0-b5c6-4982-aa47-47d8c9d8b4cf/9780472904211.epub  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/64145  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication