Chapter Деконструктивные практики XIX века (от натуральной школы до Л.Н. Толстого) и Ф.М. Достоевский

Deconstruction in the 19th Century (from the Natural School to Leo Tolstoy) and Fyodor Dostoevsky. The modern understanding of deconstruction arose from post-structuralism and implies distrust of semblance, the outward appearance of any ideology or structure, together with the search for a hidden in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Borowski, Marcin (auth)
Other Authors: Kazakov, Alexey (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:Russian
Published: Florence Firenze University Press 2023
Series:Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici 52
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_74967
005 20230803
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20230803s2023 xx |||||o ||| 0|rus d
020 |a 979-12-215-0122-3.05 
020 |a 9791221501223 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.36253/979-12-215-0122-3.05  |c doi 
041 0 |a rus 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a D  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Borowski, Marcin  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Kazakov, Alexey  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Chapter Деконструктивные практики XIX века (от натуральной школы до Л.Н. Толстого) и Ф.М. Достоевский 
260 |a Florence  |b Firenze University Press  |c 2023 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (11 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici  |v 52 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Deconstruction in the 19th Century (from the Natural School to Leo Tolstoy) and Fyodor Dostoevsky. The modern understanding of deconstruction arose from post-structuralism and implies distrust of semblance, the outward appearance of any ideology or structure, together with the search for a hidden interior. Dostoevsky renounces one-dimensionality and shows its deconstructing nature. He considers it a prejudice to believe that disclosing the hidden and forbidden has more "truth" in it, as is evident from his dispute with Tolstoy, who uses the principle of exposing the ignoble background of a supposedly noble national ideology to criticize the "defenders of the Slavic brothers" in Anna Karenina. Dostoevsky refuses to recognize the results of deconstruction (the denial of the declared) as the last and only version of the truth about reality. His approach can be defined as the "deconstruction of deconstruction." 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a Russian 
650 7 |a Literature & literary studies  |2 bicssc 
653 |a deconstruction 
653 |a Dostoevsky and the Natural School 
653 |a Dostoevsky and Leo Tolstoy 
653 |a specificity of Dostoevsky's realism 
653 |a artistic model of truth 
773 1 0 |7 nnaa  |o OAPEN Library UUID: Ф.М. Достоевский: Юмор, парадоксальность, демонтаж 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/a57e6d42-aa5c-4c13-b5da-afdbf454025f/9791221501223-05.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/74967  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication