Meta-Science Towards a Science of Meaning and Complex Solutions

Science has lost its ethical imperatives as it moved away from a science of ought to a science of is. Subsequently, it might have answers for how we can address global challenges, such as climate change and poverty, but not why we should. This supposedly neutral stance leaves it to politics and reli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Zwitter, Andrej (Editor), Dome, Takuo (Editor)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Groningen University of Groningen Press 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:OAPEN Library: download the publication
OAPEN Library: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 oapen_2024_20_500_12657_85189
005 20231116
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20231116s2023 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 648c59a2087f2 
020 |a 9789403430348 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.21827/648c59a2087f2  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a PDA  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Zwitter, Andrej  |4 edt 
700 1 |a Dome, Takuo  |4 edt 
700 1 |a Zwitter, Andrej  |4 oth 
700 1 |a Dome, Takuo  |4 oth 
245 1 0 |a Meta-Science  |b Towards a Science of Meaning and Complex Solutions 
260 |a Groningen  |b University of Groningen Press  |c 2023 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (252 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Science has lost its ethical imperatives as it moved away from a science of ought to a science of is. Subsequently, it might have answers for how we can address global challenges, such as climate change and poverty, but not why we should. This supposedly neutral stance leaves it to politics and religions (in the sense of non-scientific fields of social engagement) to fill in the values. The problem is that through this concession, science implicitly acknowledges that it is not of universal relevance. Objective knowledge, as Karl Popper calls for, might be less easily attainable in the world of ideas and within the confines of scientific idealism. However, if ideas, values and meaning have equal claim to be drivers of change in the sense of causation, aspiring to identify objective knowledge about the world of ideas and of meaning is necessary. If the sciences and disciplines aim to give objectively valid reasons for our actions (and for how to address global challenges), we need to elevate the study of meaning beyond the cultural, disciplinary and ideational delineations. We need to come to a meta understanding of values and meaning equal to objective knowledge about the material world. But differently than in the material world this meta understanding needs to incorporate individual and subjective experiences as cornerstones of objectivity on a meta-level. We need a science of meaning; one that can scientifically answer Kant's third question of "what may we hope for". 
536 |a Rijksuniversiteit Groningen 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Philosophy of science  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Sustainable development; Human flourishing; Metascience; Philosophy of science; Global challenges; Complex solutions 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/76ef016a-2ef5-410c-98ec-8c5355e9a5f3/New_Meta-Science.pdf  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/85189  |7 0  |z OAPEN Library: description of the publication