Cover Image

Comparative evaluation of microleakage among Resin-Based and nonResin-Based Restorative Materials in dentine cavities

<p>The aim of this randomized in vitro study is to clarify whether resin based restorative materials (RBRM) behave in a way comparable to non-resin based restorative materials (non-RBRM) in dentine-limited cavities with regard to their marginal fit. For this purpose, cylindrical standardized c...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Simone Thiedig (Author), Maria Giraki (Author), Stefan Rüttermann (Author), Susanne Gerhardt-Szep (Author)
Format:	Book
Published:	Journal of Dental Problems and Solutions - Peertechz Publications, 2019-02-06.
Subjects:	Research Article
Online Access:	Connect to this object online.
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Influence of three different dentin bonding agents on the adhesion of composite resin to dentine-An in vitro study
by: Christina Hoferichter, et al.
Published: (2019)

Microleakage in combined amalgam/composite resin restorations in MOD cavities
by: Kosmas Tolidis, et al.
Published: (2015)

Microleakage analysis of dental caries lesions sealed with flow resin and compared to microhybrid resin restorations in dentin
by: Amanda de Albuquerque VASCONCELOS, et al.
Published: (2018)

Effect of the additive dentine conditioning in all-in-one adhesives on the bonding strength at simulated intrapulpal pressure
by: Gerhardt T, et al.
Published: (2019)

Effect of Re-etching of Oxalate-Occluded Dentin on Microleakage of Composite Resin Restorations
by: Aida Saffarpour, et al.
Published: (2016)

Comparison of microleakage in Class II cavities restored with silorane-based and methacrylate-based composite resins using different restorative techniques over time
by: Kazem Khosravi, et al.
Published: (2015)

Hand-operated and rotary mity instruments in combination with an endodontic handpiece and endodontic motor preparation: A comparison of shaping ability in simulated curved root canals
by: Maria Giraki, et al.
Published: (2019)

Shaping ability of rotary instrumentation techniques and their limitations in simulated root canals
by: Maria Giraki, et al.
Published: (2019)

Influence of structured reporting of tooth-colored indirect restorations on clinical decision-making
by: Berz Tamara, et al.
Published: (2019)

Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro study
by: Priyatama Meshram, et al.
Published: (2019)

Effect of two bleaching methods on the microleakage of resin composite resin restorations
by: P Mirzakoucheki Boroujeni, et al.
Published: (2008)

Effect of two bleaching methods on the microleakage of resin composite resin restorations
by: F Farahnakian, et al.
Published: (2008)

Peer-based dental composite training course
by: Maximilian Dobbertin, et al.
Published: (2019)

Comparison of microleakage of an alkasite restorative material, a composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer
by: Fariba Motevasselian, et al.
Published: (2021)

Evaluation of Enamel and Dentinal Microleakage in Class II Silorane-Based and Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite Restorations Using Specific and Nonspecific Adhesives
by: Sayed Mostafa Mousavinasab, et al.
Published: (2018)

Comparative evaluation of microleakage between bulk esthetic materials versus resin-modified glass ionomer to restore Class II cavities in primary molars
by: Vellore Kannan Gopinath
Published: (2017)

Effect of Mechanical Load Cycling on Microleakage of Restorative Glass Ionomers Compared to Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities
by: Zahra Hasani, et al.
Published: (2019)

Dental training in evidence-based dentistry: A replication study
by: Stefanie Dreher, et al.
Published: (2017)

Problems with a Cordless Endodontic Hand Piece when Preparing Severely Curved Root Canals
by: Maria Giraki, et al.
Published: (2016)

The comparison of the effect of four dentin adhesive systems on microleakage of composite resin restorations in primary and permanent teeth
by: Shafiei F, et al.
Published: (2006)

An Evaluation of Different Materials for Surface Treatment on Microleakage of Repaired Composite Resin Restoration
by: Jabbar H Kammel, et al.
Published: (2009)

Microleakage of an Enhanced Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorative Material in Primary Molars
by: Baharan Ranjbar Omidi, et al.
Published: (2018)

The influence of caries disclosing agents and cavity disinfectants on microleakage of gingival floor of class V composite resin restorations
by: Safarcherati H, et al.
Published: (2007)

Microleakage Evaluation in Class V Cavities Restored with Five Different Resin Composites: In vitro Dye Leakage Study
by: Bajabaa S, et al.
Published: (2021)

Effect of Two Disinfecting Agents on the Microleakage of Resin-Based Composite Restorations in Primary Teeth
by: Zahra Bahrololoomi, et al.
Published: (1999)

An in vitro microleakage study of class V cavities restored with a new self-adhesive flowable composite resin versus different flowable materials
by: Mostafa Sadeghi
Published: (2012)

Efficacy of light curing sources and different dentin bonding agents on microleakage of class II resin composite restorations
by: M Barekatein, et al.
Published: (2007)

Microleakage Evaluation in Class V Cavities Restored with Five Different Resin Composites: In vitro Dye Leakage Study [Corrigendum]
by: Bajabaa S, et al.
Published: (2021)

Comparative evaluation of microleakage in Class V cavities restored with giomer, resin-modified glass ionomer, zirconomer and nano-ionomer: An In vitro study
by: K Mohammed Salman, et al.
Published: (2019)

Game-based learning "Jeopardy" in dental education: A pilot study
by: Sara Friedrich, et al.
Published: (2019)

Microleakage Evaluation of Class II Composite Resin Restorations with Different Thicknesses of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer
by: Horieh Moosavi, et al.
Published: (2018)

Evaluation of Microleakage at the Junction Between Combined Amalgam/Composite Resin Restorations Using Different Bonding Systems in Class II Cavities
by: Elham Zajkani, et al.
Published: (2022)

Microleakage of class v cavities restored with flowable composite materials
by: Janković Ognjenka, et al.
Published: (2014)

Microleakage comparison in temporary restorative materials in complex endodontic cavity
by: Karshma Devi, et al.
Published: (2021)

Cavity Adaptation of Water-Based Restoratives Placed as Liners under a Resin Composite
by: Sheela B. Abraham, et al.
Published: (2017)

Effect of halogene light source on marginal microleakage of resin composite restorations
by: Gajić Nataša, et al.
Published: (2010)

Effect of a Resin Coating Material on the Microleakage of Class V Restorations With or Without Post-Operative Bleaching
by: Samira Hajilou, et al.
Published: (2022)

Dual-cured adhesive system improves adhesive properties of dentin cavities restored with a bulk-fill resin composite
by: Ana Margarida dos Santos Melo, et al.
Published: (2022)

Biocompatibility Evaluation of Resin-Based Restorative Materials: A Review
by: Nurhan Özalp, et al.
Published: (2021)

Resin based restorative dental materials: characteristics and future perspectives
by: Bhanu Pratap, et al.
Published: (2019)