Cover Image

Evaluation of effects of Forsus Fatigue Resistance device in correction of class II division 1 malocclusion in adolescent patient: A case report

<p>Introduction: Class II malocclusion is one of the most prevalent malocclusions. The Class II malocclusions are caused due to forwardly placed maxilla, the backward position of the mandible, or a combination of both these factors. This disparity in skeletal base growth and position can be co...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Anupama V Jain (Author), Anand K Patil (Author), Roopak Naik (Author)
Format:	Book
Published:	Journal of Dental Problems and Solutions - Peertechz Publications, 2022-10-18.
Subjects:	Case Report
Online Access:	Connect to this object online.
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Treatment of division II malocclusion in young adult with Forsus™ fatigue-resistant device
by: U S Krishna Nayak, et al.
Published: (2012)

Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusion Using the Forsus Fatigue Resistance Device and 5-Year Follow-Up
by: Ezgi Atik, et al.
Published: (2016)

Class II Division 2 Subdivision Malocclusion in an Adult Patient treated with the Forsus Fatigue-resistant Device placed Unilaterally
by: Oscar Mario Antelo, et al.
Published: (2019)

A comparison of the treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistance Device and the Twin Block appliance in patients with class II malocclusions
by: Hanoun A, et al.
Published: (2014)

Dentoskeletal effects of the forsusTM fatigue resistance device in the treatment of class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Amal I Linjawi, et al.
Published: (2018)

Severe skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion in postpubertal girl treated using Forsus with miniplate anchorage
by: Harshal Ashok Patil, et al.
Published: (2017)

Mandibular effects of temporary anchorage devices in Class II patients treated with Forsus Fatigue Resistant Devices: A systematic review
by: Xiang Jie, et al.
Published: (2021)

Evaluation and comparison of cervical spine posture in class II division I patients treated with twin block appliances, forsus appliances, and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: A cephalometric study
by: S S Suji Krishna, et al.
Published: (2023)

Complications encountered during Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device therapy
by: Sherif A. Elkordy, et al.
Published: (2020)

Tomographic evaluation of dentoskeletal changes due to the treatment of class II malocclusion with Forsus appliance
by: Antonio Carlos Sakuno, et al.
Published: (2019)

Assessment of Airway Dimensions and Hyoid Bone Position in Class II Patients Treated with Fixed Twin Block and Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device − A Retrospective Cephalometric Study
by: Neel Dedhiya, et al.
Published: (2020)

Evaluation of Root Resorption, Tooth Inclination and Changes in Supporting Bone in Class II Malocclusion Patients Treated with Forsus Appliance
by: Amit Rekhawat, et al.
Published: (2020)

Nonextractıon Treatment Of Class Iı, Dıvısıon 1 Malocclusıon
by: İlken Kocadereli, et al.
Published: (1994)

Effective and Efficient Correction of Severe Skeletal Class II Division 1 Malocclusion with Intermaxillary Elastics
by: Mohammed K. Badri
Published: (2021)

Volumetric changes in pharyngeal airway in Class II division 1 patients treated with Forsus-fixed functional appliance: A three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study
by: Parul Temani, et al.
Published: (2016)

Timing for Functional Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
by: Gökmen Kurt, et al.
Published: (2008)

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with pronounced overbite
by: Arno Locks
Published: (2012)

Mesiodistal crowns angulation in Class II division 1 malocclusion
by: Neam F Agha, et al.
Published: (2006)

Markers of Oxidative Stress in Adolescents with Skeletal Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
by: Vesna OBRADOVIC, et al.
Published: (2018)

Non-extraction treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion
by: Abhay K Jain, et al.
Published: (2012)

Comparison of intercanine width in between Angle class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions
by: Bebby Putri, et al.
Published: (2016)

Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion using Cervical Headgear
by: Priska Lestari Hendrawan, et al.
Published: (2013)

A New And Different Approach For Class Iı Division 1 Malocclusions
by: Zahir Altuğ, et al.
Published: (2004)

Two-phase treatment of an Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion
by: Rapaport Morris
Published: (1998)

Vertical changes in treated and untreated Class II division 1 malocclusions
by: Sharp Craig, et al.
Published: (2023)

"The Evaluatıon Of Results In Class Iı, Dıvısıon 1 Malocclusıons Treated By Bıonator"
by: Mehmet Demir Yiğit, et al.
Published: (1989)

Comparıson Of The 2 Treatment Methods In Class Iı Dıvısıon 1 Malocclusıons
by: Sibel Bakır, et al.
Published: (1992)

Evaluation of arch width among Class I normal occlusion, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2, and Class III malocclusion in Indian population
by: Dolly Patel, et al.
Published: (2015)

Correction of an adult Class II division 2 individual using fixed functional appliance: A noncompliance approach
by: Shrinivas Basavaraddi, et al.
Published: (2016)

Hyoid Bone Posıtıon And Orıentatıon İn Class I And Class Iı Dıvısıon 2 Malocclusıons
by: Zafer Sarı, et al.
Published: (2003)

OUTCOMES IN EARLY TREATMENT OF CLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION WITH FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCES
by: Daniela Anistoroaei, et al.
Published: (2023)

Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion with Extraction of Upper Central Incisors
by: Murat Tozlu, et al.
Published: (2011)

Therapeutic approach to Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with maxillary functional orthopedics
by: Aristeu Corrêa de Bittencourt Neto, et al.
Published: (2015)

Treatment Effects of Farmand Functional Appliance on Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
by: HR Pakshir, et al.
Published: (2016)

Cephalometric evaluation of effectiveness Interland headgear on class II, division 1, malocclusion
by: Ana Zilda Nazar Bergamo de Carvalho, et al.
Published: (2015)

Class II Division 1 malocclusion treatment using TADs: Case report
by: Pajević Tina, et al.
Published: (2020)

"The Evaluatıon Of Results In Class Iı: Dıvısıon 1 Malocclusıons By Treated Frankel Applıance"
by: Mehmet Demir Yiğit, et al.
Published: (1989)

Class II, Division 1 Angle malocclusion with severe proclination of maxillary incisors
by: Kátia Montanha
Published: (2016)

Nonextraction correction of Class II malocclusion by pendulum appliance
by: Pallavi Jeetesh Jadhav, et al.
Published: (2021)

Comparison of Lip Analyses in Skeletal Class I Normal Occlusion and Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
by: Niam R Al-Saleem
Published: (2013)