Sacubitril/Valsartan versus enalapril in nonischemic heart failure in Paradigm-Hf trial

<p>Background: We compared the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan) with enalapril in patients who had nonischemic heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. </p><p>Methods: In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 8442 patients with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohammed Habib (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiology - Peertechz Publications, 2018-10-18.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 peertech__10_17352_2455-2976_000070
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Mohammed Habib  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Sacubitril/Valsartan versus enalapril in nonischemic heart failure in Paradigm-Hf trial 
260 |b Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiology - Peertechz Publications,   |c 2018-10-18. 
520 |a <p>Background: We compared the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan) with enalapril in patients who had nonischemic heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. </p><p>Methods: In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 8442 patients with class II, III, or IV heart failure and an ejection fraction of 40% or less to receive either LCZ696 (at a dose of 200 mg twice daily) or enalapril (at a dose of 10 mg twice daily), in addition to recommended therapy. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure, but the trial was designed to detect a difference in the rates of death from cardiovascular causes.</p><p>Results: The trial was stopped early, according to prespecified rules, after a median follow up of 27 months, because the boundary for an overwhelming benefit with LCZ696 had been crossed. The ischemic patients were 5036 (60%) patients and non-ischemic patients were 3363 (40%) patients. In ischemic and in non-ischemic group the LCZ696 was superior to enalapril for reduce primary outcome and CV death (P< 0.001). In LCZ696 group: the primary outcome had occurred in 339 patients (20.16 %) in the non-ischemic group and 575 patients (22.9 %) in the ischemic group (P: 0.03). A total of 199 patients (11.8%) in non-ischemic group and 359 patients in ischemic group (14.3%) died from cardiovascular causes (P: 0.01). and no significant difference between in CV death and primary outcome in enalapril group in the ischemic and non-ischemic patients</p><p>Conclusions: LCZ696 was superior to enalapril in reducing the risks of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure in ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure.</p> 
540 |a Copyright © Mohammed Habib et al. 
546 |a en 
655 7 |a Research Article  |2 local 
856 4 1 |u https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-2976.000070  |z Connect to this object online.