Clinical efficacy of novel self-adhesive flowable composite resin restoration: in vivo study

<p><strong>Objective:</strong> This study was carried out to evaluate the clinical performance of the conventional flowable composite resin restoration, using one- step adhesive system versus the novel self-adhesive flowable composite restoration.</p><p><strong>Me...

詳細記述

保存先:
書誌詳細
主要な著者: Ghada A Elbaz (著者), Ola M Fahmy (著者), Mohamed Sherif M (著者), Farag (著者), Yousra S Helmy (著者)
フォーマット: 図書
出版事項: International Journal of Oral and Craniofacial Science - Peertechz Publications, 2017-12-14.
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:Connect to this object online.
タグ: タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
その他の書誌記述
要約:<p><strong>Objective:</strong> This study was carried out to evaluate the clinical performance of the conventional flowable composite resin restoration, using one- step adhesive system versus the novel self-adhesive flowable composite restoration.</p><p><strong>Method:</strong> Twenty patients received forty class I restorations in primary carious molars using split mouth design. Clinical performance was evaluated using US Public Health Service modified Ryge criteria. Restorations of both materials were evaluated for: anatomic form, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, surface texture and recurrent caries after 1 week, 3, 6, 9 months and after 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Concerning the anatomic form, the marginal integrity and marginal discoloration, there was no statistical difference between both materials till 9 ms but at 12 ms, there was a significant difference in favor of the self-adhering flowable composite. As for the secondary caries till 6 ms, both materials scored 100% score 1, while, at 9 and 12 ms, there was no significant difference between both materials. The surface texture of both restorative materials scored (score1). Tracing both materials by time, there was a statistically significant difference in both materials in the anatomic form, marginal integrity and marginal discoloration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> self-adhesive flowable composite showed improved clinical performance at 12 months than to conventional flowable composite.</p>
DOI:10.17352/2455-4634.000033